Re: [Entmib] entPhysicalUris object wrap-up

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de> Wed, 08 December 2004 22:27 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA16332 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 17:27:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Cc9jA-000731-T1; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 16:52:04 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Cc9MH-000221-66 for entmib@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 16:28:25 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA04735 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 16:28:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from hermes.iu-bremen.de ([212.201.44.23]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cc9T6-0007xg-Sq for entmib@ietf.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 16:35:30 -0500
Received: from localhost (demetrius.iu-bremen.de [212.201.44.32]) by hermes.iu-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF6B3742; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 22:27:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from hermes.iu-bremen.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13880-09; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 22:27:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from james (I8848.i.pppool.de [85.73.136.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hermes.iu-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D6A33730; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 22:27:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from schoenw by james with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Cc9Lb-0000aU-Id; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 22:27:43 +0100
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 22:27:43 +0100
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
To: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>
Subject: Re: [Entmib] entPhysicalUris object wrap-up
Message-ID: <20041208212743.GB2219@james>
Mail-Followup-To: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>, Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>, entmib@ietf.org
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20041208081842.01fdcbc8@fedex.cisco.com> <p06200729bddcf64d2d89@[192.168.2.2]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <p06200729bddcf64d2d89@[192.168.2.2]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new 20030616p5 at demetrius.iu-bremen.de
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Cc: entmib@ietf.org, Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: entmib-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-bounces@ietf.org

On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 01:24:15PM -0500, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
 
> If we pursue this choice, I think that the CLEI URN document needs to 
> be a normative reference.  Kaj submitted a draft, but I don't know 
> what shape it is in and/or whether Bert is willing to either: (1) 
> allow this group to take on that document, or (2) move it forward as 
> an individual submission.  How close do folks think it is to ready 
> for publication?  Has a MIB doctor reviewed it?  Bert, do you have 
> any thoughts?

If at all, this needs a URI doctor review, not a MIB doctor review.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib