Re: [Entmib] Meeting in Korea?
Kaj Tesink <kaj@research.telcordia.com> Wed, 04 February 2004 14:15 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA06651 for <entmib-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:15:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AoNo2-0007p7-C7 for entmib-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 09:15:06 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i14EF62s030062 for entmib-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:15:06 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AoNny-0007oZ-Jf; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 09:15:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AoNnD-0007n1-Ea for entmib@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 09:14:15 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA06523 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:14:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AoNnB-0000Xl-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 09:14:13 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AoNmJ-0000Ps-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 09:13:19 -0500
Received: from thumper.research.telcordia.com ([128.96.41.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AoNlJ-0000DN-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 09:12:17 -0500
Received: from shannon.research.telcordia.com (shannon-83.research.telcordia.com [128.96.83.11]) by thumper.research.telcordia.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i14EBkai028335 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:11:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from kaj-100.research.telcordia.com (kaj-100.cc.telcordia.com [128.96.71.110]) by shannon.research.telcordia.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA06390 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:11:46 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20040204090420.02f9f198@128.96.81.11>
X-Sender: kaj@128.96.81.11
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 09:11:42 -0500
To: entmib@ietf.org
From: Kaj Tesink <kaj@research.telcordia.com>
Subject: Re: [Entmib] Meeting in Korea?
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20040203115830.03bdd5d0@ms101.mail1.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.4.2(snapshot 20021217) (thumper)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Sender: entmib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
At 12:05 PM 2/3/2004 -0500, Margaret Wasserman wrote: >Hi All, > >Do you think that we should schedule an Entity MIB meeting >in Korea? > >The Entity MIB and our Entity MIB implementation reports >are now in the hands of the IESG. > >The Entity State MIB is in a second WG Last Call, and we >don't yet have any negative review comments. If we >receive Last Call comments, I hope that we can resolve >them and send this document to the IESG before Korea. > >So, I don't think that we will have any work to do at >the next IETF meeting. What do others think? as you recall i still owe the list a draft I-D with the supplemental objects we discussed before. apologies for the delay; i'll post asap. i personally dont think that those few objects merit the scheduling of a meeting given previous discussion on the topic. as far as closing down the wg i'd appreciate some delay to accommodate this supplemental work. kaj >At this point, I personally think that the WG should >finish up these two work items (Entity MIB to DS and >Entity State MIB to PS), declare victory, and shut down. >What do others think about that plan? > >Margaret > > >_______________________________________________ >Entmib mailing list >Entmib@ietf.org >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ Kaj Tesink Telcordia Technologies. Inc. 331 Newman Springs Road Red Bank, NJ 07701 Email: kaj@research.telcordia.com Tel: (732) 758-5254 Fax: (732) 758-4177 _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ _______________________________________________ Entmib mailing list Entmib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
- [Entmib] Meeting in Korea? Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [Entmib] Meeting in Korea? Kaj Tesink