RE: [Entmib] Entity MIB v3

Hi Margaret,

I know that the MIB was not in the Charter, and Kaj's work was supposed to be pursued as an individual submission. I must have missed the point where we decided to add the objects to the Entity MIB instead (which I am fine with, btw). When did this happen? 

Regards,

Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Margaret Wasserman [mailto:margaret@thingmagic.com]
> Sent: 01 December, 2004 10:48 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de
> Cc: entmib@ietf.org; kaj@research.telcordia.com; Andy Bierman
> Subject: RE: [Entmib] Entity MIB v3
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Dan,
> 
> It was never in this WG's charter to produce the supplemental MIB. 
> At one point, we had recommended to Kaj that he pursue individual 
> submission of this document, but we have since decided to add the 
> objects to the Entity MIB instead.
> 
> Margaret
> 
> At 9:03 PM +0200 12/1/04, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\) wrote:
> >I am confused. Did not the WG decide to proceed with the Definitions 
> >of Entity Manufacturing and URN Managed Objects as an Informational, 
> >based upon Kaj's individual submission 
> >http://www.ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/internet-drafts/draft-tesin
k-entity-supplmib-01.txt? 
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Dan
>
>

_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib