RE: [Entmib] To meet or not to meet?

Kaj Tesink <kaj@research.telcordia.com> Thu, 17 June 2004 21:37 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA17718 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 17:37:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Bb4Oe-0004FD-Um; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 17:26:08 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Bb3wo-00056s-Sq for entmib@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:57:23 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA15394 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:57:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Bb3wn-0000u0-HF for entmib@ietf.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:57:21 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Bb3vn-0000bH-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:56:19 -0400
Received: from thumper.research.telcordia.com ([128.96.41.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Bb3ur-0007nm-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:55:21 -0400
Received: from shannon.research.telcordia.com (shannon [128.96.81.11]) by thumper.research.telcordia.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5HKsNcn028822; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:54:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from kaj-100.research.telcordia.com (kaj-100.cc.telcordia.com [128.96.71.110]) by shannon.research.telcordia.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA28493; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:54:23 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20040617163454.0315e048@128.96.81.11>
X-Sender: kaj@128.96.81.11
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:54:22 -0400
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, "Margaret Wasserman" <margaret@thingmagic.com>, <entmib@ietf.org>
From: Kaj Tesink <kaj@research.telcordia.com>
Subject: RE: [Entmib] To meet or not to meet?
In-Reply-To: <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F056B2FE7@is0004avexu1.glob al.avaya.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.4.2(snapshot 20021217) (thumper)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: entmib-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-bounces@ietf.org

At 10:49 PM 6/17/2004 +0300, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
>Margaret,
>
>The only possible item I can think about is about the Definitions of 
>Supplemental Entity Managed Objects draft (you may remember - I am not 
>crazy about the name). I am sympathetic to this, to the point of 
>committing to be reviewer. Did we get enough critical mass to do this work?


Dan, thanks for your review offer!
My understanding of the status and issues is the following:
1. document title is too vague
      Can be fixed in several ways; several alternatives
       were posted; seems fixable.
2. opaque object is cumbersome to implement
      Dave P. was going to write a URN based proposal;
      once there's consensus it can easily be inserted
3. acceptance as work item
      There have been several expressions of support, but not yet
      formal acceptance as a work item, and related WG charter
      extension

Since the document is small, I'm not sure whether there really needs to be
a physical meeting on points 1 and 2. Point 3 is a procedural one
that Margaret or Bert may wish to comment on in the context of needing
a physical meeting or not.

Kaj





>Regards,
>
>Dan
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: entmib-bounces@ietf.org
> > [mailto:entmib-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf Of Margaret Wasserman
> > Sent: 17 June, 2004 10:24 PM
> > To: entmib@ietf.org
> > Subject: [Entmib] To meet or not to meet?
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We should decide soon whether or not the Entity MIB WG will meet in
> > San Diego.  Thoughts?
> >
> > If we do meet, what are the likely agenda items?
> >
> > Margaret
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Entmib mailing list
> > Entmib@ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
> >
>
>_______________________________________________
>Entmib mailing list
>Entmib@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib


_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

Kaj Tesink
Telcordia Technologies. Inc.
331 Newman Springs Road
Red Bank, NJ 07701
Email: kaj@research.telcordia.com
Tel: (732) 758-5254
Fax: (732) 758-4177

_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/


_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib