Re: [Entmib] entstate-651 Notification Description Changes (Part II)

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de> Wed, 29 December 2004 07:46 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA16507 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 02:46:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CjYVW-0007qY-EW; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 02:44:34 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CjYUC-0007Ku-IN for entmib@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 02:43:12 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA16278 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 02:43:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from hermes.iu-bremen.de ([212.201.44.23]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CjYfF-0006gS-9k for entmib@ietf.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 02:54:39 -0500
Received: from localhost (demetrius.iu-bremen.de [212.201.44.32]) by hermes.iu-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BB1406B; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 08:42:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from hermes.iu-bremen.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23590-09; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 08:42:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from james (Ibbf9.i.pppool.de [85.73.187.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hermes.iu-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3D44066; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 08:42:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from schoenw by james with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Cjgq3-0000r1-4C; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 17:38:19 +0100
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 17:38:19 +0100
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
To: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>
Subject: Re: [Entmib] entstate-651 Notification Description Changes (Part II)
Message-ID: <20041229163819.GA2341@james>
Mail-Followup-To: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>, entmib@ietf.org
References: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B402240860@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com> <20041217131229.GB3523@james> <p06200716bdec84175060@[192.168.2.2]> <20041220134536.GA7717@james> <p0620071ebdecbdfd18d4@[192.168.2.2]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <p0620071ebdecbdfd18d4@[192.168.2.2]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new 20030616p5 at demetrius.iu-bremen.de
X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352
Cc: entmib@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: entmib-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-bounces@ietf.org

On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 12:45:22PM -0500, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
 
> >On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 08:34:47AM -0500, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> >Margaret, there is no constant editing. The problem are the turn around
> >cycles. If it takes many weeks to follow up on last call comments, then
> >there is a problem with the management of this WG. You reactions indicate
> >that you do not really want any contribution to this WG
> 
> It is true that I do not want any new contributions to the WG, 
> because we are supposed to be finishing our work and shutting down. 
> I think that I've made it quite clear (on several occasions) that I 
> would prefer to step down as chair of this WG, but (to my knowledge, 
> anyway), no one has volunteered to replace me.  I am not interested 
> in taking on new work that will extend the life of the WG, because I 
> don't want to keep running it.  There is no great mystery here...

The point with the notifications which triggered this thread is that 
we are discussion last call comments that I have originally posted on 
9 Jul 2003 and reposted on 29 Sep 2004. I don't think the last call 
comments can be considered a new contribution and I don't want to feel 
guilty of having done a detailed last call review. Note that I am fine 
to accept a resolution that the unconditional optional notification is 
indeed what the WG wants and then this issue is closed. What we lack 
is simply an efficient process to resolve issues raised during last
call.
 
> I don't have any problem with the Entity State MIB, except for the 
> fact that we don't seem to be able to finish it.  We keep moving (in 
> occasional bursts), but I am not sure that we are getting any closer 
> to the end.  Are you?  Do you think that the MIB is in substantially 
> better shape today than it was a year ago?

I believe this is primarily a matter of turn around times. Perhaps
you can check with Sharon whether she can allocate some more time
slots to finalize the Entity State MIB. When will the next revised
version of the document be posted? Lets work on the document rather
than this meta discussion which by itself does not move anything
forward.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib