[Entmib] entstate-335: Consensus Check
"Sharon Chisholm" <schishol@nortelnetworks.com> Mon, 12 April 2004 21:15 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA15169 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:15:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BD8lh-0004cb-TM; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:15:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BD8lI-0004bn-Mb for entmib@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:14:36 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA15114 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:14:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BD8lA-00035s-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:14:28 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BD8NR-0001La-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:49:57 -0400
Received: from zcars04f.nortelnetworks.com ([47.129.242.57]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BD7za-0007N5-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:25:19 -0400
Received: from zcard309.ca.nortel.com (zcard309.ca.nortel.com [47.129.242.69]) by zcars04f.nortelnetworks.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id i3CKObU23447 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:24:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by zcard309.ca.nortel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <GXT6RCAX>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:24:38 -0400
Message-ID: <3549C09B853DD5119B540002A52CDD340ACD5D55@zcard0ka.ca.nortel.com>
From: Sharon Chisholm <schishol@nortelnetworks.com>
To: entmib@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:24:34 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Subject: [Entmib] entstate-335: Consensus Check
Sender: entmib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
hi <editor> There has been a proposal to add a new notification related to the stand by state. There hasn't really been any opposition based on people feeling it is a really bad idea or anything, but there has been a couple bits of opposition against adding it more related to benefit, current stage in MIB development, lack of proposal, etc. Is consensus not to add this new notification(s) at this time? </editor> [Note there is a bit more in the 335 thread, but it's not really related] Sharon Chisholm Portfolio Integration Nortel Networks Ottawa, Canada _______________________________________________ Entmib mailing list Entmib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
- [Entmib] entstate-335: Consensus Check Sharon Chisholm
- Re: [Entmib] entstate-335: Consensus Check Margaret Wasserman