RE: [Entmib] Entity State MIB Next Steps

Hi

My vote is for 1), except if the current update resolves issues from the
previous working group last call do we need a second? There was substantial
rewrite, but no objects were changed. I could go either way.

I'm hoping that the more concise text in the latest version appeases the
concern that what the working group has come up with is too complicated.

Sharon

-----Original Message-----
From: Margaret Wasserman [mailto:margaret@thingmagic.com] 
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 8:26 AM
To: entmib@ietf.org
Subject: [Entmib] Entity State MIB Next Steps

Now that the newest version of the Entity State MIB is available, the WG has
a decision to make.  In my opinion, we have two
choices:

(1) We decide that the structure and objects defined in the current draft
are acceptable, and we send the current draft to WG Last Call in order to
identify and resolve final issues.

(2) We decide that we want to change the structure or objects defined in
this MIB to make it simpler or more functional.

I would appreciate it if people would respond to this message with their
opinions, so that I can attempt to judge the consensus of the WG on this
issue.

Thanks,
Margaret

_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib

_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib