RE: [Entmib] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-entmib-v3-05.txt

"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Fri, 29 October 2004 19:46 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA29763 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:46:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CNcM3-0000Iz-Au; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:24:07 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CNcFM-0007lw-9j for entmib@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:17:12 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA26725 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:17:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpout1.bayarea.net ([209.128.95.10]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CNcTg-0006Q4-On for entmib@ietf.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:32:01 -0400
Received: from shell4.bayarea.net (shell4.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.82.1]) by smtpout1.bayarea.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9TJFTHP008446; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:15:29 -0700
Received: from shell4.bayarea.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shell4.bayarea.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9TJFTIG018792; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:15:29 -0700
Received: from localhost (heard@localhost) by shell4.bayarea.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id i9TJFTVG018779; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:15:29 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: shell4.bayarea.net: heard owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
X-Sender: heard@shell4.bayarea.net
To: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>
Subject: RE: [Entmib] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-entmib-v3-05.txt
In-Reply-To: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15503C79E62@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10410291210530.14270-100000@shell4.bayarea.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b19722fc8d3865b147c75ae2495625f2
Cc: entmib@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: entmib-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-bounces@ietf.org

On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
>[Andy Bierman wrote:]
> >[Mike Heard wrote:]
> > >I see that this document has a derivative works limitation on the
> > >front page:
> > >
> > > This document may not be modified, and derivative works of it may
> > > not be created, except to publish it as an RFC and to translate it
> > > into languages other than English.
> > >
> > >
> > >Surely this is a mistake?
> > 
> > probably.  I thought this was supposed to be in an I-D
> > that is intended to be published as an RFC.  I don't
> > claim to understand the massive set of new CLRs for I-Ds. :-)

The paragraph I quoted above says (per RFC 3667) that the IETF is
not permitted to make future revisions to the spec -- which I'm sure
is not what you intended.

I have to agree with you that the rules are becoming very difficult
to understand.

> Sorry for the CLRs. But I think you can just remove that one para
> 
> Bert

That sounds right, from what I understand of RFC 3667 and its
pending update.

//cmh


_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib