[Entmib] Entity State MIB Status

"Sharon Chisholm" <schishol@nortelnetworks.com> Mon, 29 March 2004 14:51 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA04975 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:51:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B7y6O-00063O-Sq; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:51:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B7y5v-00062l-91 for entmib@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:50:31 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA04940 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:50:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7y5t-0005Jg-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:50:29 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B7y4x-0005Cn-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:49:31 -0500
Received: from zcars0m9.nortelnetworks.com ([47.129.242.157]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7y4W-00054X-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:49:04 -0500
Received: from zcard309.ca.nortel.com (zcard309.ca.nortel.com [47.129.242.69]) by zcars0m9.nortelnetworks.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id i2TEmRV15683 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:48:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: by zcard309.ca.nortel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <GXT6LMX4>; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:48:28 -0500
Message-ID: <3549C09B853DD5119B540002A52CDD340AA422E3@zcard0ka.ca.nortel.com>
From: "Sharon Chisholm" <schishol@nortelnetworks.com>
To: entmib@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:48:19 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Subject: [Entmib] Entity State MIB Status
Sender: entmib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

hi

<co-editor hat>

Ok, there were no objections to the proposed resolutions to the following
issues by the Friday date that Margaret had set, so I've moved these ones to
resolved: 306, 327

I think for most of the issues we are pretty close to rough consensus except
for those that are related to issue #355 "OSI State to Something New
Spectrum". I think we are in limbo until we agree on this and I think this
issue is the source of most frustration currently within the working group.
This relates to issues 308, 309, 312, 326, 330(editorial only I think) and
332.
	
There were a few issues where people restated their original opinions rather
than objecting to the proposed resolution. While I interpret this as
objecting to the proposed resolution, I may need to come back and ask some
annoying clarifying questions, so I would appreciate it if people could
respond to those.

</co-editor hat>

Thanks

Sharon Chisholm
Portfolio Integration
Nortel Networks
Ottawa, Canada

_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib