IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Entmib] CONSENSUS CALL: #322 - Textual Convention Names (Prefix)

Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com> Sat, 01 May 2004 17:09 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (iesg.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA03124 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 1 May 2004 13:09:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJxbr-0000pB-0K; Sat, 01 May 2004 12:45:03 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJwOk-0004tv-4r for entmib@optimus.ietf.org; Sat, 01 May 2004 11:27:26 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA25403 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 May 2004 11:27:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BJwOj-0003Ie-7A for entmib@ietf.org; Sat, 01 May 2004 11:27:25 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BJwN5-0002la-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Sat, 01 May 2004 11:25:45 -0400
Received: from mail.thingmagic.com ([207.31.248.245] helo=thingmagic.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BJwL9-0002D7-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Sat, 01 May 2004 11:23:43 -0400
Received: from [24.61.30.237] (account margaret HELO [10.0.0.64]) by thingmagic.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP-TLS id 68227 for entmib@ietf.org; Sat, 01 May 2004 11:23:05 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: margaret@mail.thingmagic.com
Message-Id: <p06020431bcb96f64ea65@[10.0.0.64]>
In-Reply-To: <3549C09B853DD5119B540002A52CDD340ACD5D06@zcard0ka.ca.nortel.com>
References: <3549C09B853DD5119B540002A52CDD340ACD5D06@zcard0ka.ca.nortel.com>
Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 11:20:57 -0400
To: entmib@ietf.org
From: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Subject: [Entmib] CONSENSUS CALL: #322 - Textual Convention Names (Prefix)
Sender: entmib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

Based on my reading of the mailing list, it seems like we have very 
rough consensus on two things related to issue #322:

(1) The TCs should be placed in a separate MIB module (within the 
same I-D) to facilitate their re-use in other MIB modules, as 
appropriate.

(2) The TCs are specific-enough to the state of logical and physical 
entities that it would make sense to use "Entity" (or perhaps 
"EntityState") as a prefix for these TCs.

I know that there were some people that didn't agree with one or both 
of these positions, but it seems like most people would be willing to 
accept these two choices.

Does anyone disagree that we seem to have rough consensus on these 
two positions?

Margaret




_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email