RE: [Entmib] To meet or not to meet?

"Faye Ly" <faye@pedestalnetworks.com> Mon, 19 July 2004 17:51 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA10871 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:51:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BmcBK-0000LQ-ML; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:44:06 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Bmc1x-0007IP-Th for entmib@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:34:25 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA09235 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:34:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Bmc1w-0001X6-S6 for entmib@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:34:24 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Bmc19-0001DX-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:33:35 -0400
Received: from mail.pedestalnetworks.com ([12.177.67.10] helo=YORKTOWN.pedestalnetworks.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Bmc07-0000ra-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:32:31 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Entmib] To meet or not to meet?
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 10:32:31 -0700
Message-ID: <93401232EABAAB4EA430E13ECC701CCF63ACA9@yorktown.pedestalnetworks.com>
Thread-Topic: [Entmib] To meet or not to meet?
thread-index: AcRtsKK+XeXj36j6QM6Qo5l+u3PL2QAAZtwwAAEEgGA=
From: "Faye Ly" <faye@pedestalnetworks.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, "Margaret Wasserman" <margaret@thingmagic.com>, <entmib@ietf.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: entmib-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-bounces@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I concur.  I think we should move this MIB forward or get it done. -faye

-----Original Message-----
From: entmib-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:entmib-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 10:10 AM
To: Margaret Wasserman; entmib@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Entmib] To meet or not to meet?


Margaret,

I do not have a strong objection to Entity MIB WG not meeting in San
Diego.

I would like however to see the 'Entity MIB Extensions for manufacturing
date and physical module identification' a.k.a 'Kaj's draft' being
continued and worked out as a standards track document. What are the
reasons that you are not prepared to take this charter item, which seems
to have received a fair amount of interest? I believe this is relative
small amount of work, and possibly Kaj can complete it in one or two
rounds if we do not philosophize too much around it. I volunteered to be
a reviewer. There may be no need for meetings. 

Regards,

Dan



> -----Original Message-----
> From: entmib-bounces@ietf.org
> [mailto:entmib-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf Of Margaret Wasserman
> Sent: 19 July, 2004 7:10 PM
> To: entmib@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Entmib] To meet or not to meet?
> 
> 
> 
> Hi again,
> 
> Just so that everyone knows, I have _not_ requested an Entity MIB
> meeting for San Diego.  If you have any strong objection to this 
> decision, please let me know before 5pm EST today.
> 
> We do need to finish the Entity State MIB and get it submitted to the
> IESG, but I don't think that the remaining issues justify a 
> face-to-face meeting.
> 
> I also support the idea that Kaj Tesink's draft should be completed
> and published, but it is not in-charter for this group and I am not 
> prepared to take on new charter items at this time.  Folks who want 
> to work on this should talk to Kaj and/or Bert Wijnen and decide how 
> to move it forward.  Perhaps an individual submission would make the 
> most sense given that it is a short/simple MIB?
> 
> Margaret
> 
> 
> At 3:24 PM -0400 6/17/04, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >We should decide soon whether or not the Entity MIB WG will meet in
> >San Diego.  Thoughts?
> >
> >If we do meet, what are the likely agenda items?
> >
> >Margaret
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Entmib mailing list
> >Entmib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Entmib mailing list
> Entmib@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
> 

_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib

_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib