IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Entmib] Confirmming Meeting Consensus

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de> Mon, 08 December 2003 13:45 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA09205 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 08:45:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ATLh8-0006lq-P9; Mon, 08 Dec 2003 08:45:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ATLgD-0006kh-3x for entmib@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2003 08:44:05 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA09182 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 08:43:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ATLgB-0003oN-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2003 08:44:03 -0500
Received: from merkur.iu-bremen.de ([212.201.44.27]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ATLgB-0003nQ-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2003 08:44:03 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by merkur.iu-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C67E7C800; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:43:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from james.eecs.iu-bremen.de (unknown [212.201.47.18]) by merkur.iu-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57BB1483AD; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:43:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: by james.eecs.iu-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F2D9981C8; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:43:30 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 14:43:30 +0100
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
To: Margaret.Wasserman@nokia.com
Cc: entmib@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Entmib] Confirmming Meeting Consensus
Message-ID: <20031208134330.GA2631@iu-bremen.de>
Reply-To: j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de
Mail-Followup-To: Margaret.Wasserman@nokia.com, entmib@ietf.org
References: <E320A8529CF07E4C967ECC2F380B0CF90244419D@bsebe001.americas.nokia.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E320A8529CF07E4C967ECC2F380B0CF90244419D@bsebe001.americas.nokia.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS 0.3.12pre8
Sender: entmib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 08:24:11AM -0500, Margaret.Wasserman@nokia.com wrote:
> 
> During the meeting in Minneapolis, there was agreement
> in the room on a few points, an dI'd like to confirm
> that consensus on the mailing list.
> 
> In particular, we reached agreement at the meeting on
> the following points:
> 
>  - We will deprecate the Alias Mapping Table so that the Entity
>    MIB can advance to Draft Standard.

Well, this is what it takes...
  
>  - Future extensions to the Entity MIB should be handled as
>    separate MIBs that augment the Entity MIB.

Not sure how useful such a blanket statement is.
 
>  - The Entity State MIB is currently too complex and should be
>    simplified.

I like to know what precisely people find too complex before subscribing 
to such a blanket statement. Can someone please explain (and perhaps
suggest what precisely needs to be removed)?

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email