IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Entmib] Confirmming Meeting Consensus

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de> Tue, 09 December 2003 10:10 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA20405 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 05:10:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ATeoc-00076l-DA; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 05:10:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ATeoV-00076O-Ad for entmib@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 05:09:55 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA20385 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 05:09:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ATeoR-0004nE-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 05:09:51 -0500
Received: from merkur.iu-bremen.de ([212.201.44.27]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ATeoR-0004ms-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 05:09:51 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by merkur.iu-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F5A81E1B; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:08:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from james.eecs.iu-bremen.de (unknown [212.201.46.146]) by merkur.iu-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B28081E11; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:08:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: by james.eecs.iu-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B587A81C8; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:08:52 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 11:08:52 +0100
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
To: entmib@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Entmib] Confirmming Meeting Consensus
Message-ID: <20031209100852.GA758@iu-bremen.de>
Reply-To: j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de
Mail-Followup-To: entmib@ietf.org
References: <20031208134330.GA2631@iu-bremen.de> <200312082236.OAA20073@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200312082236.OAA20073@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS 0.3.12pre8
Sender: entmib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 02:36:29PM -0800, Keith McCloghrie wrote:

> > >  - We will deprecate the Alias Mapping Table so that the Entity
> > >    MIB can advance to Draft Standard.
> > 
> > Well, this is what it takes...
>    
> It would be better to deprecate only the entity2Compliance statement,
> and leave the objects and group with "current" status.  Specifically,
> create a new entity3Compliance which is the same as entity2Compliance
> except for having the "GROUP entityMappingGroup" removed.  This would
> make implementation of the Alias Mapping Table the equivalent of a
> "MAY".

Interesting proposal. Anyway, how many implementation reports did we 
get for these objects? None or just one and we need two?

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email