[Entmib] I thought we were keeping entAliasMappingTable?
"Sharon Chisholm" <schishol@nortelnetworks.com> Tue, 23 March 2004 21:56 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA05081 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:56:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5tsP-00038F-BF; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:56:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5trg-00031J-OW for entmib@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:55:16 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA04943 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:55:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5tre-0007kW-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:55:14 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B5tqY-0007Zc-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:54:06 -0500
Received: from zcars04f.nortelnetworks.com ([47.129.242.57]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5tpS-0007HX-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:52:58 -0500
Received: from zcard309.ca.nortel.com (zcard309.ca.nortel.com [47.129.242.69]) by zcars04f.nortelnetworks.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id i2NLqL504633 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:52:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: by zcard309.ca.nortel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <GXT6JG8J>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:52:22 -0500
Message-ID: <3549C09B853DD5119B540002A52CDD340A967B52@zcard0ka.ca.nortel.com>
From: Sharon Chisholm <schishol@nortelnetworks.com>
To: entmib@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:52:17 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Subject: [Entmib] I thought we were keeping entAliasMappingTable?
Sender: entmib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
hi I was just looking at the lasted version of the Entity MIB version 3 and I notice that the entAliasMappingTable is still deprecated. I thought we agreed to keep this table? It's a critical table that ties together the logical interfaces and the ports. If we deprecate this table we will a leave huge gaping hole in our information model. I think it is worth holding back advancement until we get implementation reports if that is what it takes. Sharon Chisholm Portfolio Integration Nortel Networks Ottawa, Canada _______________________________________________ Entmib mailing list Entmib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
- [Entmib] I thought we were keeping entAliasMappin… Sharon Chisholm
- Re: [Entmib] I thought we were keeping entAliasMa… Andy Bierman
- RE: [Entmib] I thought we were keeping entAliasMa… Sharon Chisholm