RE: [Entmib] Final Closure on Entity State MIB Issues
"Sharon Chisholm" <schishol@nortelnetworks.com> Tue, 23 March 2004 17:26 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA13450 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:26:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5pfE-0004mx-B9; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:26:08 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5peW-0004Y5-FH for entmib@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:25:24 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA13421 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:25:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5peU-000317-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:25:22 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B5pdS-0002zS-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:24:18 -0500
Received: from zcars0m9.nortelnetworks.com ([47.129.242.157]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5pcT-0002vd-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:23:17 -0500
Received: from zcard309.ca.nortel.com (zcard309.ca.nortel.com [47.129.242.69]) by zcars0m9.nortelnetworks.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id i2NHMdF21176 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:22:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: by zcard309.ca.nortel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <GXT6JALN>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:22:39 -0500
Message-ID: <3549C09B853DD5119B540002A52CDD340A9677EB@zcard0ka.ca.nortel.com>
From: Sharon Chisholm <schishol@nortelnetworks.com>
To: entmib@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Entmib] Final Closure on Entity State MIB Issues
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:22:28 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Sender: entmib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Comments inline -----Original Message----- From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 10:13 AM To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH]; entmib@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Entmib] Final Closure on Entity State MIB Issues <clip> It seems to me that your TCs shoudl be prefixed with something aka ItuXxxx or UtuX731Xxxx That is what they claim to represent. And having said that... should it be a separate ITU module (i.e. have ITU in the name and TC-MIB as a suffix) ?? Maybe to heavy ? Sharon> Except we have made a couple of modifications to the states. I think we would have to undo these to call them OSI or ITU states. > #325: > > The figures in the discussion of this issue are wrong as > xxxCompliances(1) and xxxGroups(2) are typically registered > below xxxConformance(2). > > Sharon> This is from the MIB Review Guidelines. > I think Juergen meant to say that you are using xxxConformance(3) while you should be using xxxConformance(2). Your OIDs look like: OID tree 1.3.6.1.2.1.xx entityStateMIB [ENTITY-STATE-MIB]: module-identity 1.3.6.1.2.1.xx.0 entStateNotifications [ENTITY-STATE-MIB]: oid-value-assignment 1.3.6.1.2.1.xx.0.1 entStateOperEnabled [ENTITY-STATE-MIB]: notification-type 1.3.6.1.2.1.xx.0.2 entStateOperDisabled [ENTITY-STATE-MIB]: notification-type 1.3.6.1.2.1.xx.1 entStateObjects [ENTITY-STATE-MIB]: oid-value-assignment 1.3.6.1.2.1.xx.1.1 entStateTable [ENTITY-STATE-MIB]: table-object-type 1.3.6.1.2.1.xx.1.1.1 entStateEntry [ENTITY-STATE-MIB]: row-object-type 1.3.6.1.2.1.xx.1.1.1.1 entStateLastChanged [ENTITY-STATE-MIB]: columnar-object-type 1.3.6.1.2.1.xx.1.1.1.2 entStateAdmin [ENTITY-STATE-MIB]: columnar-object-type 1.3.6.1.2.1.xx.1.1.1.3 entStateOper [ENTITY-STATE-MIB]: columnar-object-type 1.3.6.1.2.1.xx.1.1.1.4 entStateUsage [ENTITY-STATE-MIB]: columnar-object-type 1.3.6.1.2.1.xx.1.1.1.5 entStateAlarm [ENTITY-STATE-MIB]: columnar-object-type 1.3.6.1.2.1.xx.1.1.1.6 entStateStandby [ENTITY-STATE-MIB]: columnar-object-type 1.3.6.1.2.1.xx.3 entStateConformance [ENTITY-STATE-MIB]: oid-value-assignment 1.3.6.1.2.1.xx.3.1 entStateCompliances [ENTITY-STATE-MIB]: oid-value-assignment 1.3.6.1.2.1.xx.3.1.1 entStateCompliance [ENTITY-STATE-MIB]: module-compliance 1.3.6.1.2.1.xx.3.2 entStateGroups [ENTITY-STATE-MIB]: oid-value-assignment 1.3.6.1.2.1.xx.3.2.1 entStateGroup [ENTITY-STATE-MIB]: object-group 1.3.6.1.2.1.xx.3.2.2 entStateNotificationsGroup [ENTITY-STATE-MIB]: notification-group **end of oid tree** And so 1.3.6.1.2.1.xx.2 was skipped (for as far as we can tell no good reason). Sharon> This sounds like a different problem then what he is saying. Sharon _______________________________________________ Entmib mailing list Entmib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
- [Entmib] Final Closure on Entity State MIB Issues Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [Entmib] Final Closure on Entity State MIB Is… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- RE: [Entmib] Final Closure on Entity State MIB Is… Sharon Chisholm
- RE: [Entmib] Final Closure on Entity State MIB Is… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- RE: [Entmib] Final Closure on Entity State MIB Is… Sharon Chisholm
- Re: [Entmib] Final Closure on Entity State MIB Is… Juergen Schoenwaelder