RE: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #329] AutoReply: Usage State Scope
"Sharon Chisholm" <schishol@nortelnetworks.com> Thu, 04 March 2004 02:11 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA15893 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 21:11:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AyiKE-0003bw-4Z; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 21:11:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AyiJK-0003Wh-Ps for entmib@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 21:10:06 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA15708 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 21:10:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AyiJI-0006eb-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 21:10:04 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AyiIL-0006Sm-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 21:09:05 -0500
Received: from zcars0m9.nortelnetworks.com ([47.129.242.157]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AyiHb-00069J-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 21:08:19 -0500
Received: from zcard309.ca.nortel.com (zcard309.ca.nortel.com [47.129.242.69]) by zcars0m9.nortelnetworks.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id i2427mO21530 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 21:07:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: by zcard309.ca.nortel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <GHD7FHH1>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 21:07:48 -0500
Message-ID: <3549C09B853DD5119B540002A52CDD340A60B136@zcard0ka.ca.nortel.com>
From: Sharon Chisholm <schishol@nortelnetworks.com>
To: entmib@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #329] AutoReply: Usage State Scope
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 21:07:47 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Sender: entmib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
hi Here's my summary of the issues in this #329 thread: 1. It seems that some state/status objects apply to the entity itself, while others relate more to its ability to do containment. This should be made more clear. 2. It seems that there is a difference between entities which can contain other entities and those which never will with respect to some states. This should be made more clear. 3. Dave doesn't see a use for the usage state. Sharon -----Original Message----- From: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 3:06 PM To: entmib@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #329] AutoReply: Usage State Scope Hi I think it is important to distinguish between standardizing on the behaviour and characteristics of physical entities and how this information is reported. I think when you look at different real-world products you can't really generalize by physical class type, only by the features that are supported. Some of the fans and power supplies I've heard about are very sophisticated. I'm not saying that all fans and power supplies should be, but I don't want to put anything in the MIB that would prevent these entities from taking advantage of the reporting capabilities within the MIB. Sharon. -----Original Message----- From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 8:48 AM To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH] Cc: entmib@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #329] AutoReply: Usage State Scope <clip> In short: I think the interpretation of the states for the various entity classes needs to be clarified. (I think Dave also wrote something in that direction.) Without guidance from the spec, implementations will just not use the same model and fail to interoperate. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany _______________________________________________ Entmib mailing list Entmib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib _______________________________________________ Entmib mailing list Entmib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib _______________________________________________ Entmib mailing list Entmib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
- [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #329] AutoReply: Usage Stat… Sharon Chisholm
- Re: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #329] AutoReply: Usage … David T. Perkins
- Re: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #329] AutoReply: Usage … Juergen Schoenwaelder
- RE: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #329] AutoReply: Usage … Sharon Chisholm
- RE: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #329] AutoReply: Usage … Sharon Chisholm
- RE: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #329] AutoReply: Usage … Sharon Chisholm