Subject: Re: [Enum] 5 years since last message
From: "Livingood, Jason" <[email-masked]>
To: Olivier Guillard / AFNIC <[email-masked]>, Jaap Akkerhuis <[email-masked]>
Cc: IETF ENUM list <[email-masked]>, Bernie Hoeneisen <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 00:41:09 +0000
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>

So what needs to happen here? Seems indisputable that there's not much happening on the ENUM front...

On 6/27/19, 9:48 AM, "enum on behalf of Olivier Guillard / AFNIC" <[email-masked] on behalf of [email-masked]> wrote:

    pong :-)
    
    le Tuesday 15 January à 13 H 17 , Jaap Akkerhuis a écrit :
    >  Bernie Hoeneisen writes:
    > 
    >  > Hi Jaap
    >  >
    >  > Well, there is a dependency on this list in RFC 6117...
    >  >
    >  > On the other hand, registering new ENUM services has not been that popular 
    >  > either for several years...
    >  >
    >  > cheers
    >  >   Bernie (Designated Expert of the IESG and other list maintainer)
    > 
    > In that case, it would make sense that you take over the maintaining
    > of this list as well. Would you? If so, let's arrange that off-list.
    > 
    > 	jaap
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > enum mailing list
    > [email-masked]
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
    
    -- 
    Olivier
    
    _______________________________________________
    enum mailing list
    [email-masked]
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum