Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged))
 by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA24854
 for <enum-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:35:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
 by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id TAA02212
 for enum-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:35:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA01546;
 Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:26:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176])
 by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA01496
 for <enum@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:26:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from shell.nominum.com (shell.nominum.com [128.177.192.160])
 by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA24741
 for <enum@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:26:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from shell.nominum.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by shell.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
 id 0CD933190C; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 16:26:14 -0800 (PST)
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Patrik_F=E4ltstr=F6m?= <paf@cisco.com>
Cc: "Yu, James" <james.yu@neustar.biz>, "'Lawrence Conroy'" <lwc@roke.co.uk>, 
 enum@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Enum] Re. 2916bis 
In-Reply-To: Message from =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Patrik_F=E4ltstr=F6m?=
 <paf@cisco.com> 
 of "Wed, 20 Feb 2002 23:03:14 +0100." <2852914.1014246194@localhost> 
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 16:26:14 -0800
Message-ID: <18027.1014251174@shell.nominum.com>
From: Jim Reid <Jim.Reid@nominum.com>
Sender: enum-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: enum-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org

Forgive me, but could someone please explain why we need to say
anything about NAPTR records in 2916bis? I thought this document
defined a protocol for mapping E.164 numbers into domain names.

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum