Re: [Enum] FW: I-D Action: draft-goix-appsawg-enum-sn-service-00.txt

[Lawrence Conroy <[e-mail]>]

Hi Richard, folks,
 Um -- yeah?
Just in case there was some misunderstanding, neither do I. If someone wants to use this stuff, bring it on.
(considering the welter of stuff I've put into ENUM, I'm hardly in a position to complain :).

I don't think the comments I put in were unreasonable -- these will need to be fixed, so rather than slow things down later I put in comments on the ENUM-y bits now.

The registration process of 6117 is designed to (i) make the registration process easier and (ii) cover the bases that need to be covered so folk can build/use this stuff (not just put it in a document and forget it).

This is one of the first ones through that new process, and its from apps area/W3C/OMA-led work. Helping folk to ensure it does actually tick the 6117 boxes is hardly meant to be awkward.

all the best from a bemused
  Lawrence



On 3 Mar 2012, at 15:38, Richard Shockey wrote:
> What's the big deal here.  Sure they can clean up some text, but the intent
> of the process was to make these things simple.  This is another Carrier
> ENUM concept probably in association with RCS or some other scheme.  And
> there are lot more coming.
> 
> I certainly have no objection to this registration moving forward.
> 
> FYI I have it on good authority that the meta data issue is coming back.