Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama IETF94
"Linlin Zhou" <zhoulinlin@cnnic.cn> Thu, 05 November 2015 10:52 UTC
Return-Path: <zhoulinlin@cnnic.cn>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B121ACDA0 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 02:52:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.212
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.212 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M2hNyTByHMyg for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 02:51:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp13.cnnic.cn [218.241.118.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B231B1ACDAE for <eppext@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 02:51:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zll (unknown [218.241.111.73]) by ocmail02.zx.nicx.cn (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf0ApMDjJNDtWhWpvBg--.13936S2; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 18:51:54 +0800 (CST)
From: Linlin Zhou <zhoulinlin@cnnic.cn>
To: 'Rik Ribbers' <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl>, 'Declan Ma' <madi@zdns.cn>
References: <CAJ9-zoXEL_QMsGJ1ZkNr61VHqXRCFCR8o6_UHO7vZxRtV-ZL=w@mail.gmail.com> <0101FBC0-248F-4560-9364-F023B901A959@zdns.cn> <38638B99-20DF-40B3-B431-36ECFE27485F@sidn.nl>
In-Reply-To: <38638B99-20DF-40B3-B431-36ECFE27485F@sidn.nl>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 18:52:28 +0800
Message-ID: <157c01d117b8$10c8ee40$325acac0$@cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AQHRF6m/rAvehStPRk6QhO2K+qk4CZ6NHF6AgAAG1ICAAB0TMA==
Content-Language: zh-cn
X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf0ApMDjJNDtWhWpvBg--.13936S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UjIYCTnIWjp_UUUY17k0a2IF6ryUM7kC6x804xWl14x267AK xVWUJVW8JwAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGw A2ocxC64kIII0Yj41l84x0c7CEw4AK67xGY2AK021l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j 6r1xM28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_Gc CE3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxI r21l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87 Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lc2xSY4AK 67AK6r4DMxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrV AFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF67AKxVWUAVWUtwCI c40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r1xMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267 AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr1j6rW3Jr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVAFwI0_ Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvj4Ry8 9KDUUUU
X-CM-SenderInfo: p2kr3zplqox0w6fq0xffof0/
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/-HlFcRnE6WrGzFzihMhI9bRLSK8>
Cc: 'Ulrich Wisser' <ulrich@wisser.se>, EppExt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama IETF94
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 10:52:04 -0000
Hi Rik, > The conclusion for me is that there was no objection to work on informational > document in general by the working group. There was no clear consensus on > working on the informational verification draft James Gould was presenting. > +1 > As it is Thursday on the IETF (read: I am tired) I may be wrong, so feel free to > confirm or correct me. > I have the same conclusion. > Gr, > Rik > Regards, Linlin
- [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama IETF… Ulrich Wisser
- Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama … Declan Ma
- Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama … Rik Ribbers
- Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama … Linlin Zhou
- Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama … Linlin Zhou
- Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama … Rik Ribbers
- Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama … Gould, James
- Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama … Rik Ribbers
- Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama … Linlin Zhou
- Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama … Gould, James
- Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama … Linlin Zhou
- Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama … Gould, James
- Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama … Linlin Zhou
- Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama … Gould, James
- Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama … Antoin Verschuren
- Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama … Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama … Rik Ribbers
- Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama … Gould, James
- Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama … Ulrich Wisser
- Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama … Antoin Verschuren
- Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama … Ulrich Wisser