Re: [eppext] Suggestion for check domain extension
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Fri, 02 October 2015 10:58 UTC
Return-Path: <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAABD1B29F3 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 03:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YFUcVtyr34Cj for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 03:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-f97.google.com (mail-oi0-f97.google.com [209.85.218.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7A5F1B29F2 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 03:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oixx17 with SMTP id x17so6373941oix.2 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 03:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date :message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language :content-type:mime-version; bh=/4rIEI78xaHijpCmhttO1q2ReayrjIYwuiXlaufYp1A=; b=NbNWnON5w/eEWLJQg2Sm8OvygnzhKiric48mJIQMUeXMImmbxgGADz8vqUeZxeGIvX i3uvtJIafhKbsInI63gL+zmWP4yyK/XlKVI9wQ3uARFNmnMvES85InKyqAov9XLPXRh0 0sObV9/oFi5NyGtJ6v2w2bwDs9uf6LgeOAwRI7DWn0vLm8l+7IdXl61y7tB2+egIKKAm dgAHukKD8wLR0/aX+PljRQjpRMPXe0pvkJv1vog/XQLUxfshm30/8RDlFSPqlu7Hav8+ 0i5p4hwm8YZRpxmB5rR3DQZZMmgOBWvmKD5TDPrqj3Jz8geoveEer251C+uFCIIJ/Lru XnnA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk44iL5c4UmIPGkl4tfxVFw2IqOAbRVo4+iXVUX0eZ65vgIatEY0Mvoowy/9JITUlHXTMVnO004WTf0SKkKeYbweaxBZQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.27.66 with SMTP id b63mr19462478qkb.4.1443783499111; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 03:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com (brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com. [72.13.63.42]) by smtp-relay.gmail.com with ESMTPS id b67sm1055332qka.7.2015.10.02.03.58.18 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 02 Oct 2015 03:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Relaying-Domain: verisign.com
Received: from brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas02 [10.173.152.206]) by brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t92AwI3d026693 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 2 Oct 2015 06:58:18 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 06:58:18 -0400
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: Michael Hansen <mih@one.com>, "eppext@ietf.org" <eppext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [eppext] Suggestion for check domain extension
Thread-Index: AQHQ/PJC+ib3+WviIEaFNe/wevGWnJ5YCBAA
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 10:58:17 +0000
Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A0A6CD3@BRN1WNEXMBX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
References: <560E4A1C.7050301@one.com>
In-Reply-To: <560E4A1C.7050301@one.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A0A6CD3BRN1WNEXMBX02vc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/0bkSqe-wFVfrMn0PnKUGq8_EEtw>
Subject: Re: [eppext] Suggestion for check domain extension
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 10:58:22 -0000
Have you considered writing a draft describing such an extension? It would be nice if the AFNIC extension was registered: http://www.iana.org/assignments/epp-extensions/epp-extensions.xhtml#epp-extensions-1 Scott From: EppExt [mailto:eppext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Michael Hansen Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 5:11 AM To: eppext@ietf.org Subject: [eppext] Suggestion for check domain extension As a registrar I would like to see a standard way in check domain to get information about if a domain is blocked or reserved, like in the AFNIC extension ( http://www.afnic.fr/xml/epp/frnic-1.3) ... <!-- AFNIC <check> response extensions details --> <complexType name="resChkDataType"> <choice> <element name="domain" type="frnic:resChkDomDataType"/> </choice> </complexType> <complexType name="resChkDomDataType"> <sequence> <element name="cd" type="frnic:domCheckType" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </sequence> </complexType> <complexType name="domCheckType"> <sequence> <element name="name" type="frnic:domCheckNameType"/> <element name="rsvReason" type="eppcom:reasonType" minOccurs="0"/> <element name="fbdReason" type="eppcom:reasonType" minOccurs="0"/> </sequence> </complexType> <complexType name="domCheckNameType"> <simpleContent> <extension base="eppcom:labelType"> <attribute name="reserved" type="boolean" use="required"/> <attribute name="forbidden" type="boolean" use="required"/> </extension> </simpleContent> </complexType> ... Using the current check domain it is not possible to identify blocked/reserved domains unless the reason can be parsed, as most just return unavailable for blocked domains, and available for reserved domains. It might also be extended with some kind of identifier for who the domain is reserved to (i.e. domain name for .uk domains, or VAT number for .rio domains). Regards Michael Hansen Senior Developer One.com A/S
- [eppext] Suggestion for check domain extension Michael Hansen
- Re: [eppext] Suggestion for check domain extension Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [eppext] Suggestion for check domain extension Linlin Zhou