Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama IETF94

Since there were no more comments, I have submitted the minutes with 3 minor adjustments:

-Corrected the spelling of my name ;-)

-I have added clarifying text on the status of the nv draft as some have missed the conclusion during the meeting:

"opposition and support for nv-mapping document. Will be taken to the list when discussing milestones"

-Clarified what the second hum was about:

"Hum, no objections to for defining groups of work items to determine milestones”.

Regards,

- --
Antoin Verschuren

Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392

Op 19 nov. 2015, om 15:11 heeft Ulrich Wisser <ulrich@wisser.se> het volgende geschreven:

> There has been some insecurity about the hums at the meeting. We did more than two, but we couldn't really decide what we did hum about after the fact. As I recall the meeting there were only two hums that did really count. The two hums that Antoin mentioned.
> These are reflected in the minutes.
> Could one of the chairs please upload the minutes. It seems only chairs can do that.
> 
> /Ulrich
> 
> --
> Ulrich Wisser
> ulrich@wisser.se
> _______________________________________________
> EppExt mailing list
> EppExt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext

Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama IETF94

Attachment: signature.asc