Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama IETF94

Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl> Thu, 03 December 2015 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@antoin.nl>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0301A9040 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 07:54:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.083
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.083 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZJz4sjDhfgb2 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 07:54:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from walhalla.antoin.nl (walhalla.antoin.nl [88.159.164.218]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77F71A9046 for <EppExt@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 07:53:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a01:670:6aa4:da00:462a:60ff:fef4:e7f2] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:670:6aa4:da00:462a:60ff:fef4:e7f2]) by walhalla.antoin.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8EFB28076B; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 16:53:58 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=antoin.nl; s=walhalla; t=1449158039; bh=YTx4O0fYyhfvKC+gUOinQiVVE0Va9a61f6dd2mw0few=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=NFu99ZkIBIX+zb+PUFvIrXEDb8mrmpw7JxcyYRS7N3F7OHuSk46yGh99IgTGB+7uI 79+uwgHfrjmu3TFD0/HXtpYTyZ0OXhrTrbeHGoUZsnufmw9VSXIGSCgdGfrVVvRlPJ BNunqhtooExnafkoUiUeRvfH8HBoyhE2hQIRb/ck=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_02AF7EE9-B889-40C1-B3C6-103C959AA357"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ9-zoXvMiZ6LLMmbz2h0OVTXxXfNudkngo=MUXmXanf-zMqyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 16:53:52 +0100
Message-Id: <9C6C4F14-2804-47EB-A89D-925B6CC7BAF1@antoin.nl>
References: <CAJ9-zoXEL_QMsGJ1ZkNr61VHqXRCFCR8o6_UHO7vZxRtV-ZL=w@mail.gmail.com> <0101FBC0-248F-4560-9364-F023B901A959@zdns.cn> <38638B99-20DF-40B3-B431-36ECFE27485F@sidn.nl> <2015110519525639913345@teleinfo.cn> <CDF93078-FA84-48EB-8EC0-DAE733681C6E@sidn.nl> <77db8b89.aea.150d83acd38.Coremail.zhoulinlin@cnnic.cn> <425852A8-E258-4660-BB6D-6D78A2CD1D27@verisign.com> <CC7C221E-729E-4351-BB72-009F3174B74F@antoin.nl> <2BD325B9-FC16-45F9-AE5B-4A11E1404161@verisign.com> <CAJ9-zoXvMiZ6LLMmbz2h0OVTXxXfNudkngo=MUXmXanf-zMqyw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ulrich Wisser <ulrich@wisser.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/0fGXhNDoDm6NEZUlpmdlOq0voKA>
Cc: eppext <EppExt@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama IETF94
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 15:54:02 -0000

Since there were no more comments, I have submitted the minutes with 3 minor adjustments:

-Corrected the spelling of my name ;-)

-I have added clarifying text on the status of the nv draft as some have missed the conclusion during the meeting:

"opposition and support for nv-mapping document. Will be taken to the list when discussing milestones"

-Clarified what the second hum was about:

"Hum, no objections to for defining groups of work items to determine milestones”.

Regards,

- --
Antoin Verschuren

Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392






Op 19 nov. 2015, om 15:11 heeft Ulrich Wisser <ulrich@wisser.se> het volgende geschreven:

> There has been some insecurity about the hums at the meeting. We did more than two, but we couldn't really decide what we did hum about after the fact. As I recall the meeting there were only two hums that did really count. The two hums that Antoin mentioned.
> These are reflected in the minutes.
> Could one of the chairs please upload the minutes. It seems only chairs can do that.
> 
> /Ulrich
> 
> --
> Ulrich Wisser
> ulrich@wisser.se
> _______________________________________________
> EppExt mailing list
> EppExt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext