Re: [eppext] RDAP adoption?

Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> Tue, 10 November 2015 18:45 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@hxr.us>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149201A9025 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:45:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bqU8BamwHVcz for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:45:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 880C41A9022 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:45:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so148285933wme.0 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:45:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hxr_us.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=bPHlknhRPlvvPXu6TseylS9PnqiKUAHSdSxQyEjka+A=; b=qI6TxuVRQyN4CmjzuG3oiRpOX6+SknkUy1gYCS3f9GaNkpvC0XVDeKFaC13bcp3dgA Oh6JjaLAV0nGMadhwCrvsrSi7Z1yAm9zif+004rHh8PZ2CaiYMuHD8z/llrKS6h3FqJc AN3cZRYVI/OqAw1v2lRNifjqIr/DUVrY8PxH6dVBtq2tYNYYCB9VgAAoSp1lr9Wv1ATE XjnkWG3t+ypbzdaS5OjHTBTr0RH7qMFiiY8lrfu95uI+/1Krfbw2eYdTWiQWlcHkOYOb AhxSMvochCI5bu8pq62PltjgI4zOKr3B8vNduoN1oW4RMVPNraM5aPh59CsebG6zUuh5 Yh9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=bPHlknhRPlvvPXu6TseylS9PnqiKUAHSdSxQyEjka+A=; b=PpV3Vbocf79QmtWWO4aJQyQM8eqsV4NgeT8zn3uxh0YYQbKqJjpr5TmO8xzA9W+4xL EDieozcIbvL7pxDHkaO0dSlRTGyxWmFV02Dp9fHY7jVuNJ/SC2H2ostxB4uHCCGHuLtP FTi5H7/E/BKAmNSSeDv+1fxEOlMdWf4ZeaKoIbGPFOJ/Yc9wuwMSDFw3BOylEaMG1W6b HRluNZZx/UZm0cWJlghjlvS8WRwooBRNyeZKWOjQhjJu98N7PdSklxhprwJWclIdzzLs jgEYhwKj+cmHCpcywOYKGjsSLtDJWuuOXGu8vFUqTWyZvC+fJiTADDgaA9wbT3tR2UjL Jsmg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnSSbjsDoUwFKQbxxREw1buPv1r7IcruFoBwZvXVoOwKONGBvjht+3qcabTyg/58pQsz/1o
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.28.143.144 with SMTP id r138mr6899429wmd.100.1447181134088; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:45:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.91.134 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:45:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:500:4:15:84df:8a21:c9ca:e159]
In-Reply-To: <56422EE7.5040007@iit.cnr.it>
References: <564167D3.7050805@dcrocker.net> <56422EE7.5040007@iit.cnr.it>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:45:34 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAQiQReMmO3HnSKfrLFEyLwp-LSxHTLgcB+35L6+JMS_8kg_gA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
To: Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/0kSXVVeoTKzvN1sSHkIkSwFZqSI>
Cc: eppext <eppext@ietf.org>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eppext] RDAP adoption?
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:45:37 -0000

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Mario Loffredo
<mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it> wrote:

>   At the moment, the only way to represent this statuses according to the
> RDAP profile is to add an unrecognized member together with a status
> reported in RFC7483

Actually, there is an IANA registry for status values. Inventing new
JSON members for that need is not the right way to do it.

>
> - Registrar role publicIDs member
>   The RDAP profile states that the entity with the registrar role MUST
> contain a publicIDs member to identify IANA Registrar ID from the IANA's
> Registrar ID registry.
>   In .it, we have a lot of medium/small registrars registering only .it
> domains so none of them appear in the IANA Registrar ID registry.
>   Furthermore, there are some domains managed by the registry itself (nic.it
> for example) or by italian public entities registrars (government, regions,
> and so on)
>

publicId is not a required field. And it can be used for more than
just ICANN identifiers.

-andy