Re: [eppext] WG Last Call - final charter

"James Galvin" <galvin@elistx.com> Tue, 26 January 2016 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <galvin@elistx.com>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CBE81B2ADE for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:08:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4vz08RGnJtK4 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:08:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02AF71B2ADD for <eppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:08:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id b14so135396763wmb.1 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:08:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elistx-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=17WpD0m74qClrq2SKlKGELDiMEDCbVaeK0aUJehvBdE=; b=dKH0G8rVwScHRMn7Hg4OrOAZf97bFDBEQ0PoBqHhrJyKbbyMVqaQ9XSAUbZLWxjyGc AfpSHmae1dC23rn/rvaBiLH/QxCQ/iBA33AU1ETAUl9e0a2gUXcLKmFbgHHCfUbf3Vp6 foWgJ2XPZaXxX7Te6Hs4p1YogqWUXyrqvi7EV4aGroR0Cut1ccp/AFVv5MpKKZnu2w8M DqOIG4R6uYro2K6TF83h5E2rgbrw4ae8fLbRmawahQ1WQO/ZOfMit2muJNwy9g0vc7kV G0r3ERYQkeGtdEFG+s16HCAiLvNzNUWwCJ7mlRQPu8nIcRhTB9/Yq46fUtrV6T7QXGzu IyiQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=17WpD0m74qClrq2SKlKGELDiMEDCbVaeK0aUJehvBdE=; b=KSWNelc1eTK4kmJpfjw1sKPhw7vAguumJEAx1606edA/TzvUIGoIkX0hgVTMfXbjck /SpNfB58B+ot81M7/2ry8FwsyCs7ljLzzssH5aBydxxKoqfRmAvtAm01WAVsrBhwW41y 8Bt3u+M7E8jGu2M/WvK4T3RZRB4UQYRD2RjrqNbbvKbbTIWxR7M/ENIKGQdqiyK4U3wn REfUO3wlLuKz7CWaxPUgnWcAZm6JrVDdgjttBEDYCsCqTeVjuROkvjFXe9ji/PVaTSsx fUflAa7YeDAUhZgf0HRyZS/OhztgYYOSolbSoKo018blB231vZNjHCJtT6wzk1EQANgC eEJA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSSSndfZ2DColnUdyneNPc10/CykIggFXaBlGr9uYKX+SYNZNIyM4EhAAMiZf23Pg==
X-Received: by 10.194.91.210 with SMTP id cg18mr23653060wjb.117.1453820927476; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:08:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.100.1.12] (44-0.dc.icann.org. [192.0.44.0]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id ha9sm1887945wjc.3.2016.01.26.07.08.45 for <eppext@ietf.org> (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:08:46 -0800 (PST)
From: "James Galvin" <galvin@elistx.com>
To: eppext <eppext@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 10:08:43 -0500
Message-ID: <321C709B-09C6-4DAF-907A-E00C2FA81B35@elistx.com>
In-Reply-To: <3A67CC38-47E2-4CD7-968B-EF007EE1A464@elistx.com>
References: <3A67CC38-47E2-4CD7-968B-EF007EE1A464@elistx.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.3r5187)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/1qResZYbT8EVdoXE3sZyV5bVB4k>
Subject: Re: [eppext] WG Last Call - final charter
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 15:08:51 -0000

Thanks to those who have indicated their support for the charter.

I haven’t seen any objections.  We will wait until Friday before 
submitting this officially.  I just wanted to remind folks to comment 
before then.

Thanks,

Jim



On 22 Jan 2016, at 16:11, James Galvin wrote:

> Attached is the final charter for the new working group.  It has all 
> changes discussed to date and the milestones as agreed on the list.
>
> There is one change I included that got very little discussion on the 
> list and I wanted to call it out so folks could consider if they want 
> to keep it or remove it.  This is the reason for a “last call” on 
> the charter before committing it to the IESG.
>
>
> Marc Blanchet proposed the text I included in this message:
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/-Ef1Pdi-9uFIZC7yTAYDeIxCZV0
>
> There was no response to this message on the list.
>
>
> Marc first made the suggestion here:
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/ouE4fgfXAUWJG96XvgqjDR9OfoQ
>
> As Chair I had suggested we not include the change but Jacques Latour 
> asked to have the change included.  Here is the final message in this 
> short thread:
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/jCF6tfwIFVGi6E8lXFFKU0TVW3Q
>
>
> Would working group members please indicate their support or objection 
> for this change by Friday, 29 January 2017.  It’s a two sentence 
> change to the charter if folks want to remove it.
>
> Jim