IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [eppext] Working Group Last call for draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase

"Gould, James" <JGould@verisign.com> Mon, 03 August 2015 12:47 UTC

Return-Path: <JGould@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB271A011B for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 05:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B2cCG7XsNQWK for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 05:47:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-f100.google.com (mail-oi0-f100.google.com [209.85.218.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5F761A00E9 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 05:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oiho132 with SMTP id o132so6474160oih.2 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 05:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language :content-language:content-type:mime-version; bh=1B5qEMTzWpInd+t8D9MatyVHovFAZbzUPGc0YepqmvU=; b=Fe72t0fZn8LAdV8sF+lmg8GupbqQRaRWF06AdsFVctlYxD+/E+HAIcSNPnJSDk3KIe dpMfMk7KgspQF0XFMOM3N7UX1hYrZGVAJmdsly9B/tgu9xegJ6LtZ1optRqo5R8TbiDL ZHy6wXUFM48jt3jGO46/sIdgsvGoDVN55HYQymFX3GXW5NpQUwWcvCay8B5uHcTRJTi6 kgx6jEa0Zq5lYSwrGWdEQMPKzp3gUaDx12G3SZTAqPW4w53ssYO6T/MhS8l3jnk76caC cfPc0iOjqFPgxoEKwatzJd1PSGwezfO66uv1dozQ/KcG4/UYgsNG9iW19scx/Q48Tuyr ireA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkbg6lHI6lZooKf7w1vkSht37IpzDcJhy9Io4SwZgGCzsbIfbvMURHcCbZZ/pfYNG6PnlyGgzXDdrkHKPrkJQUoyAUOJA==
X-Received: by 10.55.25.80 with SMTP id k77mr11565997qkh.105.1438606026845; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 05:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com (brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com. [72.13.63.41]) by smtp-relay.gmail.com with ESMTPS id o80sm948152qko.3.2015.08.03.05.47.06 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Aug 2015 05:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Relaying-Domain: verisign.com
Received: from brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas02 [10.173.152.206]) by brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t73Cl5mn028976 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 3 Aug 2015 08:47:05 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 08:47:05 -0400
From: "Gould, James" <JGould@verisign.com>
To: Gustavo Lozano <gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
Thread-Topic: [eppext] Working Group Last call for draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase
Thread-Index: AQHQw7PGDfsfEMeUJ0unINw+OYtqa53mK0AAgAFqqsqAAAWFsIABoXYAgAFXnoCAD/wrgA==
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 12:47:04 +0000
Message-ID: <F74FE142-4B2E-40EE-BC7B-E915C9B82E7E@verisign.com>
References: <B785119F-67E7-4B34-9995-6A6F5806DF10@antoin.nl> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A022CD2@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A022D7F@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <C41D7AF7FCECBE44940E9477E8E70D7A4AE9BCF3@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A0246A7@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <9843E2BC-3B81-4453-9C74-6D698CC1CD37@antoin.nl> <D1D7C62A.B1D22%gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <D1D7C62A.B1D22%gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_004_F74FE1424B2E40EEBC7BE915C9B82E7Everisigncom_"; type="multipart/alternative"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/3dlFdbCbNyyhtPPdfr_F5-q1GuI>
Cc: Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl>, "eppext@ietf.org" <eppext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eppext] Working Group Last call for draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 12:47:13 -0000

draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase-06 was posted that incorporate the input received during the WG last call.  I support pulling in draft-lozano-tmch-func-spec as a WG document since it provides the process flow information supported by draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase.  The following changes were made to draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase-06 based on the WG last call feedback:

  1.  Removed duplicate "TMCH Functional Specification" URIs based on
       feedback from Scott Hollenbeck on the eppext mailing list.
   2.  Changed references of example?.tld to domain?.example to be
       consistent with RFC 6761 based on feedback from Scott Hollenbeck
       on the eppext mailing list.
   3.  A template was added to section 5 to register the XML schema in
       addition to the namespace based on feedback from Scott Hollenbeck
       on the eppext mailing list.


—


JG


[cid:77031CC3-BE7A-4188-A95F-D23115A30A4D@vcorp.ad.vrsn.com]

James Gould
Distinguished Engineer
jgould@Verisign.com

703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

VerisignInc.com<http://VerisignInc.com>

On Jul 24, 2015, at 4:40 AM, Gustavo Lozano <gustavo.lozano@icann.org<mailto:gustavo.lozano@icann.org>> wrote:

Hi Antoin,

Comments inline.

Regards,
Gustavo

On 7/23/15, 14:10, "EppExt on behalf of Antoin Verschuren"
<eppext-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:eppext-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of ietf@antoin.nl<mailto:ietf@antoin.nl>> wrote:


We have 2 options for this:
-Replace the normative reference to another stable document, perhaps an
ICANN document?
-Revive draft-lozano-tmch-func-spec and take it up as a WG document and
proceed that one first.

draft-lozano-tmch-func-spec has been revived.



Gustavo: Are you willing to revive your document as it is currently
expired,

Yes

and make a request to the WG to adopt it?

I will request the adoption of this ID as a WG document.

The WG can perhaps already review this document in parallel and provide
you with feedback.

This will be great.

Regards,
Gustavo
_______________________________________________
EppExt mailing list
EppExt@ietf.org<mailto:EppExt@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email