IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [eppext] rechartering

Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> Wed, 29 July 2015 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@hxr.us>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB171A916E for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 08:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, J_CHICKENPOX_52=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xkMu5WWtLPUc for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 08:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 595CE1A90B8 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 08:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so207695112wib.0 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 08:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=EOh+DmWdjbxZQDmlcMqLzyOtNfGlZN+paDsra3Ju2ME=; b=WdDEDpHnkGw8QwWj8VGjWUDBHhQ163MKaOXmTCXrl4kRfHSVh/GjGy/aHsBUO02+J+ 9iH7mDa3HQgobLNS2L5tj3A6ud0NDm/MoYdIhSq9o0bXNsh4SVJRd0SRnY9Vpx6y5Lbn gOu3Tef9qmpai4cj69EN1bbI68aYK+lC7vI0esyj90gYn+zo2B8e0ggtwTvC/nXQNi+V pW49v0VfsPjvLN1QP/QwrH+JlolpojvIrNkRrzKUioEdS54R4wZZT3BY37N6bgIID6kD GSqvkxdElFJ78w1Ap3GPY1TA2HnaUsZWplGl1pSXTtn6JL4KWksaDjTbAwCCWKc+vIQH mK2g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnzCZyRVGtDwaAU5bBZcKMmgC7Q8EXNBWUoU0QH++H/0cXFaNo3WO/yQKFv0t+KtpYGaEf9
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.21.244 with SMTP id y20mr18752257wie.65.1438185362162; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 08:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.249.99 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 08:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:500:4:15:5852:20c3:fdf5:bf0a]
In-Reply-To: <A73C7C2E-2DA2-42C1-94A8-4C8C2DB46B8C@viagenie.ca>
References: <CAAQiQRdBDKb8NF+d2COxTVCbx7MMtV4dsTRDSqBotq6XroHxBQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150729000315.GA30829@home.patoche.org> <CAAQiQRdQ=3rAJFxLDcr25o+qgezGd1ceScuyj7kC5jwkh6G_vg@mail.gmail.com> <A73C7C2E-2DA2-42C1-94A8-4C8C2DB46B8C@viagenie.ca>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:56:02 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAQiQRe95z1=qeddwRMrX_AzREr4EY=jZa-=wCYTS4sA3BPjow@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
To: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/48kqZ7cs2DkTHUZOoURlM19ZRJ4>
Cc: Patrick Mevzek <pm@dotandco.com>, eppext <eppext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eppext] rechartering
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 15:56:32 -0000

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Marc Blanchet
<marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> wrote:
> I disagree with putting a priority in the (new) charter. I think this is
> just a triage function that can be done by the chairs, depending on which
> topic needs more priority. We may end up having epp-ext-1 and rdap-ext-4 be
> higher priorities than epp-ext-2.  Again, just a chair+wg triage function to
> me.

I think it is important to be sensitive to the EPP work that has
already built up. I do not care about the mechanism to address it.
Another solution would be to add a 3rd co-chair if the necessary. You
need a blue dot, Marc? :)

> I also think that the level of work is not too heavy and can easily be
> handled in a single working group.

Agreed.

> Here is a proposal for the working group name: regext  (REGistration
> protocols EXTensions)

Or maybe PIRO: Protocols for Internet Registry Operations.

-andy

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email