IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [eppext] revised draft charter - v2

Rik Ribbers <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl> Mon, 31 August 2015 11:17 UTC

Return-Path: <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81981B3207 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.294
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.294 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12VwJgvqGhZr for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from arn2-kamx.sidn.nl (kamx.sidn.nl [IPv6:2a00:d78:0:147:94:198:152:69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E92861B32B9 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; d=sidn.nl; s=sidn-nl; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=from:to:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:x-originating-ip:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=9OCtUsBe9r99R9q+2c/PmC+wjr/oU1vSMbnl95hIW50=; b=FLLsqddhSuLAWakZ8XHvjJNV4+rXrjkkJ3/pv/wmr1f82MW4HsmEBo6f6Ree1ntDbt43mNJlNdb9FUz7BYL3SqQhpLASbdRNvsT5xEEp6xQ0LMjTp9oJ7lhu01yQWGAewJjK8LTr+cmluuizAabJ3jUqZ4ADYTGZY0JtetNIEApFm9aEpqr9oYrUznQGEwtUdaFkqmgGfjUWKjj/Lh3m97A9bLbZck9YkOonbmPDdVor6Dqdm9Wf1H9D51QI1z9Qwmu5O/KAJdEE/RSIS1h30yi0nZf3uWquh7DmM6dvEJOMklEVB4VmY3j7u19bXnM5JrnvwP55zVRU1Yee1Eyglw==
Received: from ka-mbx03.SIDN.local ([192.168.2.179]) by arn2-kamx.sidn.nl with ESMTP id t7VBHkW5020375-t7VBHkW7020375 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=CAFAIL); Mon, 31 Aug 2015 13:17:46 +0200
Received: from KAHUBCASN02.SIDN.local (192.168.2.76) by ka-mbx03.SIDN.local (192.168.2.179) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1076.9; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 13:17:48 +0200
Received: from KAMBX1.SIDN.local ([fe80::501d:affc:30a9:4edf]) by kahubcasn02 ([192.168.2.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 13:17:47 +0200
From: Rik Ribbers <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl>
To: 'James Galvin' <galvin@elistx.com>, "eppext@ietf.org" <eppext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [eppext] revised draft charter - v2
Thread-Index: AQHQ4dgdwuPCnNEtyUuPjbNmnnlSQJ4l+NQw
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:17:48 +0000
Message-ID: <C80127C588F8F2409E2B535AF968B768BA233E3B@kambx1.SIDN.local>
References: <55E0D247.2020408@elistx.com>
In-Reply-To: <55E0D247.2020408@elistx.com>
Accept-Language: nl-NL, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.2.171]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/4F2ZZakLMI51ftpI-0IhfXd0Y3I>
Subject: Re: [eppext] revised draft charter - v2
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:17:52 -0000

+1 for the charter text

One question. If we are creating aliases for mailingllist should we consider the provreg mailing list? Then at least all EPP mailing lists I am aware of are relayed to on place.

Gr,
Rik 

-----Original Message-----
From: EppExt [mailto:eppext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Galvin
Sent: vrijdag 28 augustus 2015 23:28
To: eppext
Cc: Barry Leiba
Subject: [eppext] revised draft charter - v2

There were two suggestions on the list for extending the charter.  One seemed to suggest being the home for all protocol extensions.  A second was to focus on just RDAP and EPP extensions.

I believe the restriction to just RDAP and EPP had more support.  There were a few people who suggested they didn't really want to join the two protocols but they also said they would not object to joining them.  I counted this as support for the merge.

Marc Blanchet proposed a new name of REGistration protocols EXTensions (REGEXT).  There were no objections so I adopted it in this revised draft.

Here is a draft for consideration by the working group.  I have not yet added milestones, which are necessary before submitting this to the IESG for review.  I also have to finish reviewing the discussion for the 3 documents in WGLC so I can make sure to include them appropriately in this charter.

Please comment on this charter and suggest milestones for inclusion by Friday, 4 September 2015.

Jim

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status