Re: [eppext] draft-wilcox-cira-idn-eppext-00

JF Tremblay <jean-francois.tremblay@viagenie.ca> Sat, 07 March 2015 15:13 UTC

Return-Path: <jean-francois.tremblay@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496651A89A8 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Mar 2015 07:13:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XOSfg42-Kzb1 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Mar 2015 07:13:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9073D1A1B82 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Mar 2015 07:13:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2620:0:230:2001::1006] (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:2001::1006]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B741141319; Sat, 7 Mar 2015 10:13:44 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: JF Tremblay <jean-francois.tremblay@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <9C598D80CB5D6544818FE5EB30CA175CD5260B9D@EXCH-01.CORP.CIRA.CA>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 10:13:41 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FE43CFBF-0F0C-4CB8-9C06-69A41A4F9BD7@viagenie.ca>
References: <20150306154709.17870.88958.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <7BE158D8-BB7B-4B66-8176-34805213A971@viagenie.ca> <9C598D80CB5D6544818FE5EB30CA175CD5260B9D@EXCH-01.CORP.CIRA.CA>
To: Tongfeng Zhang <tongfeng.zhang@cira.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/5hGgHHFJfSVPvBAaM7dqvfigz68>
Cc: "eppext@ietf.org" <eppext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eppext] draft-wilcox-cira-idn-eppext-00
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 15:13:48 -0000

> On Mar 6, 2015, at 12:12 PM, Tongfeng Zhang <tongfeng.zhang@cira.ca> wrote:
> 
> Good stuff.
> I have a couple of comments below.

Thanks for reviewing it. 

> - Section 5.1.4 should be titled "EPP <transfer> Query Command" because 5.1 is about "EPP Query Commands". The normal transfer command falls under "EPP Transform Commands”.

Noted, will update in next version. 

> - In Section 7, the statement "For a label size of 64 characters, the list of label variants may reach up to 320 entries." The 320 is not mathematically right. To be exact, it should be 5 power of 64. :)

Right… Must have written this on a pre-coffee morning. It’s 5 possible code variants over 64 positions, so 5x5x5x5x… 64 times, so 5^^64, or 5.4E44. More than enough to create a DOS on the server from a single registrar query, even if the registrar is unwillingly participating (might be an unchecked request from the public registrant side, the web interface for example). Will update that text.

JF