Re: [eppext] Recharter Milestones discussion

Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> Fri, 04 December 2015 16:40 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@hxr.us>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B651D1A0145 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 08:40:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IUbsIlfeS2F7 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 08:40:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22c.google.com (mail-wm0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C6D61A013F for <eppext@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 08:40:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so72105260wmw.0 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 08:40:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hxr-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XUK2PFeGDS/SrqqPXyALvOHLpmQhAqTnKqFs8wPWxh0=; b=brXqRJXWatK/10gTFHbsrl0RYqHgL/JbRO02fBROj6i5p+qPNmszwMBAmX5wrvx2kl Sjcf7eisAayN03AVcs4yGMTjc6Z6EyY9VJBa7aaNW762Qz0Q7mu4q3bwcoQ11n73+uoJ QvtiT2fmXKpiitEX9mHqZeDAlbD3V2vA6m+MfnTzj4odTaBQz0LEaOHFoTT0gPzr3kqu iKqL92q9ZInG1TZiuS1rBDiwi5tmr6YAKIMTiUWLrhRClp6JQTBPQaqvlPqg818nqqOv rp/80yF9KiQiYTkY1i11I95rlY+EirqubK4f93CbGWb6yT16ni2xRqNkslZeLB4fYABG WL8w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XUK2PFeGDS/SrqqPXyALvOHLpmQhAqTnKqFs8wPWxh0=; b=ZmGHbrUSg0g7bo6r9FYHU/ciCfIgYcPkziFJX99egIVwfmHFtPCTMg/yapYd2cpsY6 7da6Idjbg0vsHQPeFDRPneAz2fntdWtPuEJlPBfAofJU89aU5s+drxZSyomGObCabQ70 BUzThP0wZfe1NxmBeh2N+UnU+cBNoKvdK27Am9p7yNGMXL3Ubtkqm4vTvu7joynpshoL CjJGj3b5XLsPrWzOXVHNpyH4k63G2m1iC38llWicMZdIEV42TlvUSQJrOsJW8pUgGE+h BPy5EclsLuxB4NerdqNgOeb/W2aYfQUAQ/RJ+TjG5dewGNQDUWfIrLeQcrc+L7HgG38R Gseg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk/qofPin7CBCw9uCjYSBbEid9Cye91+yDyd3+Kr9TqLTTWYO1hRLx6wLGS1ahu8f1j/OcP
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.28.63.204 with SMTP id m195mr5858514wma.11.1449247218190; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 08:40:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.91.203 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 08:40:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [192.149.252.11]
In-Reply-To: <88CB461C-6892-48A4-8044-FCA0FBA0C305@antoin.nl>
References: <F8238C95-4212-419A-BDE3-913E5CA6F99F@antoin.nl> <306B0937-894B-44FB-896E-0C5110673879@sidn.nl> <88CB461C-6892-48A4-8044-FCA0FBA0C305@antoin.nl>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 11:40:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAQiQRd_1ohC-W1uyJJk4EAPi8dR04yWoikALdKRLjzG1XvyFw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
To: Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/6XQxjN-CPa-3337DjyG_BY07G04>
Cc: eppext <eppext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eppext] Recharter Milestones discussion
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 16:40:20 -0000

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl> wrote:
> That does not mean we cannot work on documents in group 3 before the deadline.
> If we’re done earlier with documents in group 3 because there happens to be momentum for one of the drafts that’s fine too.

I think that is the important thing. No working group has ever been
penalized for completing work ahead of schedule (probably because no
working group has ever completed work ahead of schedule, but that's a
different matter).

As long as we recognize that milestones are malleable and that the
IESG wants an initial starting point, I'm good with what you have
stated.

-andy