Re: [eppext] I-D Action: draft-lozano-ietf-eppext-registrar-expiration-date-00.txt

"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Thu, 21 January 2016 19:52 UTC

Return-Path: <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012021A9034 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:52:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bItID5_mYXeE for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:52:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x261.google.com (mail-qg0-x261.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::261]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B6FF1A9036 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:52:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qg0-x261.google.com with SMTP id 6so2907894qgy.1 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:52:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=verisign-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=A6RWJ5T0s/whsGifH33+aVkweUQ7QHYe0d8x6f4K+Og=; b=tw3P9se0uqbhJixfQpfT5pgkSApFHW0fLa6CvSSuGukN4jd9Be/c+CxxUDp87ZDZSY p5bB5RYrRpvSC0A6zb1QfZfS4+yhaUvPGI7/C0GSHyZ4u1Xqs7D61lvmUHR7umHABHdD 9gO7KfCxFZVeJyiOg5xp9oVyxWQ+N5lcuaS00O8DVht+VfuYOgDCadW14FrRa+qRmqzF nMgx9En5lzoX7cSww+Do+awjd2/lza1K1srThxY5baiA97fn7E4q9mZBIc7xXygAlP3i dbpMN5vtr8shWvUHy9/uJGmGVC3D8n7ul2t5H+sRUZM0FksTgLbaBGHdIZU4ShzkRglc hGJg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language :content-language:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; bh=A6RWJ5T0s/whsGifH33+aVkweUQ7QHYe0d8x6f4K+Og=; b=ib7lcYvYWlAcAYL5ZdXmPo1nKTM1yZhQKARwYWBiptqjtq7MPFScQXMXbzg3Aqx2C6 IUPSuoz0xwFKKwQj1yp65xFtT5c/rb8YpKazva0/whQNFHqsrYzixplUF0N/J14dMyzC G8KUAc5GYkp/RwSDOGWgh+17JziVwpwsEeHMsihhx7tNcE0I8RwV2l0Kix8/VM0xeaei 2U0Op46lhdVK2OXBsJyD4q2cqaXaubuc1MlNrJVD5wG2nYLDQqSBpKLuZ9c2yOiFYwVi dZATzMDBTelyateb1kxIsL5UiWcvoHmfslXLODCeJxHULw3XJsMzuLwDiPvSBfLg4COr GF+A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk7BT6P+n2xEnpdyhy7JTI6fbi3wyehkfHylsjQ+2TxrxXO5DqRuCH9ATq8wumK0QdxnEmEt8N2S9+mdd3Vhwwj1qLYXA4qlOgAkPMXswinauBTg4g=
X-Received: by 10.140.16.225 with SMTP id 88mr55844833qgb.96.1453405958480; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:52:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com (brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com. [72.13.63.41]) by smtp-relay.gmail.com with ESMTPS id g133sm382024qkb.1.2016.01.21.11.52.38 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:52:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Relaying-Domain: verisign.com
Received: from BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexchm01 [10.173.152.255]) by brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u0LJqbuc014167 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 21 Jan 2016 14:52:37 -0500
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 14:52:37 -0500
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: "eppext@ietf.org" <eppext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-lozano-ietf-eppext-registrar-expiration-date-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRVII5CddH1x7oPEyvfpfQ7AYzkZ8GX2rQ
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 19:52:36 +0000
Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A133A9D@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
References: <20160121193028.13313.82104.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160121193028.13313.82104.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/6v1awkJ6RlY93xaml09lbTaQ6C4>
Cc: "Gustavo Lozano \(gustavo.lozano@icann.org\)" <gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [eppext] I-D Action: draft-lozano-ietf-eppext-registrar-expiration-date-00.txt
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 19:52:41 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 2:30 PM
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Subject: I-D Action: draft-lozano-ietf-eppext-registrar-expiration-
> date-00.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> 
> 
>         Title           : Registrar Registration Expiration Date
> Extension Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
>         Author          : Gustavo Lozano
> 	Filename        : draft-lozano-ietf-eppext-registrar-expiration-
> date-00.txt
> 	Pages           : 15
> 	Date            : 2016-01-21
> 
> Abstract:
>    This document describes an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
>    extension mapping for the provisioning and management of the
>    registrar registration expiration date for domain names stored in a
>    shared central repository.  Specified in XML, this mapping extends
>    the EPP domain name mapping.

Gustavo, I wish this document would explain what this value actually means given that registrars are not the authoritative source of information for domain expiration dates. Could you please add some text to the Introduction that explains the purpose of the value and what it means of the context of the expiration date maintained by registries? Can they ever be different? What does it mean if they are different? Why are both needed if they are supposed to be the same?

I'd also like to suggest that you add text to the different command descriptions to make it clear what the values represent when you're extending a renew, transfer, etc.

Scott