IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [eppext] keyrelay draft

"Gould, James" <JGould@verisign.com> Fri, 01 May 2015 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <JGould@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BABD1A1B21 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 May 2015 09:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8NZGRRHCl6aj for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 May 2015 09:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-f98.google.com (mail-oi0-f98.google.com [209.85.218.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 998771A6FCF for <eppext@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 May 2015 09:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oiav1 with SMTP id v1so3489354oia.1 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 May 2015 09:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language :content-language:content-type:mime-version; bh=XjCGddyWyS9wPpyBGTnZGGEzzZ6fU64QOGJUKliT2YM=; b=WiUOWZ0z5p7/uSBx/0vUe4T3ssy1xn5PnNvXn2xGTMFqBian62nmUV0/UAHPbkHseo Ve21XD636J+CYmmlsnxwcGoqVhkKxrnilWNIwfITezxGhQUw9+vlSFJeM9Wcs5Z5IMXB zcyTmsjU6pFyIMB6ilwxymaHCYtvk84fSz61bUWxlRoyBZfH8Wx3jmjATGrZuYXbJUcS NqiYx1czlhCmUykNooLJH5iWcdSyyQhKN1KyHdJbioqVCLkHYRpoEoehQ8Ej2ju1ZNLP O58tjkDtHiStXGgGmvbYVGuYp17xWFmTyNyX9g3hLRT5tGEffUur49epl1H1n6PkFIXP cy9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlFvJQ5oh+70bwdws0dmHCTJ7A+jvBNoJTmDkiMYsxdBKpBSvkyli/IFfj7DrBsi0IOia+4pGX5Z4D4c46BO4nB799rXg==
X-Received: by 10.140.90.99 with SMTP id w90mr11420653qgd.57.1430497099922; Fri, 01 May 2015 09:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com (brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com. [72.13.63.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y7sm1456227qci.3.2015.05.01.09.18.19 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 01 May 2015 09:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Relaying-Domain: verisign.com
Received: from BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexchm01 [10.173.152.255]) by brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t41GIIbu019914 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 1 May 2015 12:18:18 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Fri, 1 May 2015 12:18:18 -0400
From: "Gould, James" <JGould@verisign.com>
To: Rik Ribbers <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl>
Thread-Topic: [eppext] keyrelay draft
Thread-Index: AdCEIZRovM1kBW7uQ+inotnc6EGsBgAKmEaA
Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 16:18:18 +0000
Message-ID: <42C99BCD-619E-4300-82D9-92810CC71AF8@verisign.com>
References: <C80127C588F8F2409E2B535AF968B768B97499BC@kambx2.SIDN.local>
In-Reply-To: <C80127C588F8F2409E2B535AF968B768B97499BC@kambx2.SIDN.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_004_42C99BCD619E430082D992810CC71AF8verisigncom_"; type="multipart/alternative"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/6voURDb63f3kaJ3xe3YOU-esaHg>
Cc: "eppext@ietf.org" <eppext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eppext] keyrelay draft
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 16:18:29 -0000

Rik,

Thanks for making the updates.  I reviewed the updated draft and it addresses the concerns that I raised on the mailing list by defining Key Relay as an object mapping.

Thanks,


—


JG


[cid:77031CC3-BE7A-4188-A95F-D23115A30A4D@vcorp.ad.vrsn.com]

James Gould
Distinguished Engineer
jgould@Verisign.com

703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

VerisignInc.com<http://VerisignInc.com>

On May 1, 2015, at 11:15 AM, Rik Ribbers <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl<mailto:rik.ribbers@sidn.nl>> wrote:

Hello,

As you might have noticed we've published a new version of the keyrelay draft. Major change is the new XML structure as suggested by the WG. Hopefully this will help the document move forward.

As always any feedback is appreciated.

Regards,
Rik Ribbers
_______________________________________________
EppExt mailing list
EppExt@ietf.org<mailto:EppExt@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext

v2.34.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status