IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [eppext] RDAP adoption?

Rik Ribbers <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl> Tue, 10 November 2015 14:30 UTC

Return-Path: <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3FCE1B2A31; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 06:30:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.084
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.084 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YKgoOwcJh0vV; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 06:30:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from arn2-kamx.sidn.nl (kamx.sidn.nl [IPv6:2a00:d78:0:147:94:198:152:69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E3C11B2A15; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 06:30:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; d=sidn.nl; s=sidn-nl; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:x-mailer:x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader:x-originating-ip:content-type:mime-version; bh=BdLgRQiwdCyGQWb6SQeHCQCot71XmwD0RqbBj1i2rg8=; b=wM8UFiZntpEFQglBYQSCh6f64zqrcne9qMbnNPbqb1wCOytwYmOuPNJ0MQN+8HEqBpTJetw8OkFstACJRy48e1wnxt6vJy4JLKqvVpCAhv8M38bWvl3LNOyHehuDhIRUUBr/sSLSFNziCQYeEXsCqAKShtKIF7SBbdNHb0I3B5Nc5esAZTHx6r3RWN3pFDOSM9U1xGauJZpKG7hM3ZTF4Q+Vf1QmFPnx9xS6UUYHE9t7lxgkKiPwfh3J7Cpl7yNHEmBdZR6CUErABg5tW3jMK54m2QSuAOjoushnK8e6mxyp3QBghngMXDHJlv/psBxm2C2/c6T5XsKClW7iZA1jdw==
Received: from ka-mbx02.SIDN.local ([192.168.2.178]) by arn2-kamx.sidn.nl with ESMTP id tAAEUbkJ012477-tAAEUbkL012477 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=CAFAIL); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:30:37 +0100
Received: from ka-mbx02.SIDN.local (192.168.2.178) by ka-mbx02.SIDN.local (192.168.2.178) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1076.9; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:30:41 +0100
Received: from ka-mbx02.SIDN.local ([fe80::9855:369a:1ca4:6549]) by ka-mbx02.SIDN.local ([fe80::9855:369a:1ca4:6549%13]) with mapi id 15.00.1076.000; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:30:41 +0100
From: Rik Ribbers <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl>
To: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Thread-Topic: [eppext] RDAP adoption?
Thread-Index: AQHRG72MktoDusWQ80yaI1Fg37pA0J6VOhAAgAAGawA=
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:30:40 +0000
Message-ID: <115DBEF8-0DC9-49C6-ABAD-4BABDC1C0EEC@sidn.nl>
References: <564167D3.7050805@dcrocker.net> <CAAQiQReK_hUOhX-TyCibTphr5M81P7fT8_8o6XQgrAHuHGV04Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAQiQReK_hUOhX-TyCibTphr5M81P7fT8_8o6XQgrAHuHGV04Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: nl-NL, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5)
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.168.4.218]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A0A4B030-4033-44A4-BEE3-22807888EB05"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/7Z-yVyECgssVnbM7bIHOEPMH314>
Cc: "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>, eppext <eppext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eppext] RDAP adoption?
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:30:50 -0000

I also recall from the REGOPS workshop the Brazilians (.br) have an server side implementation in production and there is a RDAP library for servers in JAVA available from DNS Belgium (.be).

Gr,
Rik  

> On 10 Nov 2015, at 15:07, Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
>>  *  How much operational deployment of servers supporting it is there?
> 
> In the RIR space, 4 of the 5 RIRs have production systems with the 5th
> working on moving their beta into production.
> 
>> 
>>  *  How much client deployment in software?
> 
> At the REGOPS workshop in Prague, I think .CZ mentioned they were
> working on a client. And perhaps there was one other TLD doing so as
> well.
> 
> I've put out NicInfo: https://github.com/arineng/nicinfo
> And I do have a browser-based, pure Javascript client in
> proof-of-concept stage awaiting my undivided attention to be
> completed.
> 
>> From a server software standpoint, RIPE NCC's code is open sourced and
> on GitHub. CNNIC has a server implementation developed under contract
> with ICANN, and ARIN has developed a bootstrap sever (on GitHub) which
> is also an ARIN service.
> 
>>  *  But ultimately how much client/server use of the protocol is
>>     there, so far?
>> 
>>  *  Any sense of the adoption/use trends?
> 
> I ran some stats on the ARIN service back in early September (we
> deployed in late June, so around 70 days after deployment), and here
> is what I had:
> 
> Entity queries:        173
> Domain queries:        290
> IP queries:          40818
> Autnum queries:       9203
> Registry queries     50224
> Bootstrap queries      608
> Total Queries        50817
> 
> Top 10 User Agents
> 23270 "-"
> 15457 "NicInfo
> 7712 "curl/7.30.0"
> 1258 "ColdFusion"
> 1027 "Mozilla/5.0
> 395 "python-requests/2.7.0
> 393 "libwww-perl/6.08"
> 359 "Apache-HttpAsyncClient/4.0
> 305 "Python-urllib/2.7"
> 165 "curl/7.19.7
> 
> So that is in the noise when compared to port 43 or even ARIN's
> proprietary restful service, but it's also new.
> 
>> 
>>  *  Any sense of what is delaying more and better adoption/use?
>> 
>>  *  Any sense of what might improve things?
> 
> Yes, movement in the gTLD space. We see a lot of domain queries.
> 
> -andy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> EppExt mailing list
> EppExt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email