Re: [eppext] New Version Notification for draft-wilcox-cira-idn-eppext-00.txt

JF Tremblay <jean-francois.tremblay@viagenie.ca> Tue, 24 March 2015 15:33 UTC

Return-Path: <jean-francois.tremblay@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C623A1A8954 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2AGaPOjpnv8E for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8362E1A893A for <eppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from h200.viagenie.ca (h200.viagenie.ca [206.123.31.200]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27D0840400; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:33:19 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_435A2C39-C3BC-48E6-A9DE-F01A852B60F7"
From: JF Tremblay <jean-francois.tremblay@viagenie.ca>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <2015032415450373649010@cnnic.cn>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:33:16 -0500
Message-Id: <762D97F5-E815-4935-AFFB-62702FC6BECE@viagenie.ca>
References: <20150306154709.17870.88958.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <, > <7BE158D8-BB7B-4B66-8176-34805213A971@viagenie.ca> <2015032415450373649010@cnnic.cn>
To: Linlin Zhou <zhoulinlin@cnnic.cn>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/8_9EwoL80BZPqmFWJ1g3hMY_QvM>
Cc: "eppext@ietf.org" <eppext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eppext] New Version Notification for draft-wilcox-cira-idn-eppext-00.txt
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:33:30 -0000

> On Mar 24, 2015, at 2:45 AM, Linlin Zhou <zhoulinlin@cnnic.cn> wrote:
> 
> I found that 5.1.2.2 specifies a protocol level extension that some elements are similar with domain <info>. Whether or not a object or command-response extension is enough. 

Thank you for reading and commenting. 

However, I am not sure I understand your comment. Are you saying that existing elements of domain <info> should be used instead of the extension objects?

Of course, it’s clear this overlaps with other extensions proposed by other. This is actually something that could be added to the next version of the draft in order to facilitate the life of the expert reviewer.

JF