IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [eppext] [weirds] Fwd: rechartering

Ulrich Wisser <ulrich@wisser.se> Tue, 28 July 2015 13:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ulrich@wisser.se>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D77A1A8BB6 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VCtaFz-GaEIb for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com (mail-la0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CEF01A8AE5 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lafd3 with SMTP id d3so58131428laf.1 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:27:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=yN4rt6583byInjWizU8EOCps3nJC+dzZ2850+dQsdZ4=; b=kJ8yeed3gXh4JoE8usE0sr2LZiONPeUkwLggzjIwee2Jm79ZQlvKWZipjqQNnT6qbI +QexORxlpdpmPWsj0fo/k+CwrqNh8mZUWsSqeXLMAldb7/TCB2hVU7XBoFTib7eAjHPM ZfYCZYNMupUkogezHAIX07Z12919oPDj3mA6E+oHt+a1UivoCFvwV+JPxeXRon4V5pYK 5tSin93NBideZcjwvWl+EK1e8tlwTnJtDpjZjXaUzu94rWDBxGbiU3Wk0GzFj+JDMoJn LPzsWVxUp3hFRy9dqiMpDvSltzNgmHQ+XmgYqs9p6K8hgOQjMVXPqClRqvDcS6wmOqmp eVQg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmL5meeonE4vLlByqgmSD2YAKZCByAkyRIQ8UHggJQaI2JwyS5i/SruS+Erf3x8q7x0Wh0O
X-Received: by 10.112.56.139 with SMTP id a11mr32528363lbq.90.1438090064580; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:27:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAAQiQRdBDKb8NF+d2COxTVCbx7MMtV4dsTRDSqBotq6XroHxBQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAQiQRd=65H=oTGFEz5ew_+cbKiKZo+xu5Ypb+cf89KtrPK0Pw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAQiQRd=65H=oTGFEz5ew_+cbKiKZo+xu5Ypb+cf89KtrPK0Pw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ulrich Wisser <ulrich@wisser.se>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:27:35 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJ9-zoVruyN19CeK5ApFFhXXhzS0r2N9126thMSgKRHyiYBZ6Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>, "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>, eppext@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1133a352746a7e051bef6f46"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/D8uEuPIdhbXrpb0nI8d0LIIDH0U>
Subject: Re: [eppext] [weirds] Fwd: rechartering
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:27:50 -0000

Good idea! There is much overlap.

Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> schrieb am Di., 28. Juli 2015 um 15:20 Uhr:

> Since there has been no negative feedback, I'm cross-posting this to
> WEIRDS to see what people over there think.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
> Date: Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:21 PM
> Subject: rechartering
> To: eppext@ietf.org
>
>
> All,
>
> I'd like to offer another idea for the rechartering of this working group.
> Instead of focusing exclusively on EPP extensions, would it be better if we
> rechartered to focus on protocol issues of Internet registries... more
> specifically EPP and RDAP.
>
> Given that the constituencies for both have considerable overlap, and
> there is already at least one draft covering the mapping between EPP and
> RDAP and that there will likely be future drafts where the inputs of EPP
> and the outputs of RDAP are correlated, this seems like an easier way
> forward.
>
> I spoke privately with Scott, Barry, and Pete (the AD behind the
> chartering of both EPPEXT and WEIRDS) just to see if I wasn't barking madd,
> and they each thought it makes sense.
>
> What are your thoughts and comments about such an approach?
>
> -andy
>
> _______________________________________________
> weirds mailing list
> weirds@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds
>
-- 
Ulrich Wisser
ulrich@wisser.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email