IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [eppext] draft charter for discussion

James Galvin <galvin@elistx.com> Tue, 21 July 2015 13:47 UTC

Return-Path: <galvin@elistx.com>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A93F1B2E0A for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 06:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZAreq2SXo5aD for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 06:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com [209.85.212.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFDAE1B2C3F for <eppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 06:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicgb10 with SMTP id gb10so56275039wic.1 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 06:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tLTz5mh5yCilyhlArHE6EPufPGY6Iapb1W2tQhC2+40=; b=QQKsbjgoP5HZFmYz/n6yw5LNXCbfVNzdqZQeTCrror8JSY2m5+KZxq8Tw0TstLE1Ni 6EPP165IBHSACq/CvBUbew16t6xs+1ANX/4ZjNGrVb5NtfEK8lH1NRpiCBy4QIZj8PTs ze4ZPN/QX0p7MyD3VxoylADhuKBQb5dwKbS1D9tk1Siysemx54tt7hBiwHJmDCzOt9gl yLVFaEHP3VQ7JJ22SeocZNZ8WTcE97Fd93RbrFABNwBL8Hqe38HPSn+9Zg9nn8TwcENI Iwn+SQv3llyNdynnMzTg2vrUeYzMT3VP56f+834AZcdnp8UC2vUtnNUSrZx1MCK7wRxF rpMg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk44OfskNZ3PTbB5a4/g9PrUGS0QDvgUuGV+Ss9cYAdLK77Iw2QDuingak+9Gs2Lw2majOA
X-Received: by 10.180.77.40 with SMTP id p8mr32470896wiw.29.1437486472563; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 06:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-b40d.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-b40d.meeting.ietf.org. [31.133.180.13]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id ju2sm16963805wid.12.2015.07.21.06.47.50 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Jul 2015 06:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55AE4D90.6070707@elistx.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:48:00 +0200
From: James Galvin <galvin@elistx.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, eppext <eppext@ietf.org>
References: <55AE079B.90100@elistx.com> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A022DEB@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
In-Reply-To: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A022DEB@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/F0IGMsnlPsH_whwvjIVbt_dPTzA>
Subject: Re: [eppext] draft charter for discussion
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:47:55 -0000

Thanks Scott.  I'll make this change for Wednesday.

Jim



On 7/21/15 3:26 PM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: EppExt [mailto:eppext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Galvin
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 4:50 AM
>> To: eppext
>> Subject: [eppext] draft charter for discussion
>>
>> Attached is your Chairs' proposed draft charter for discussion during
>> our meeting on Wednesday, and continued follow up on this list.
>>
>> If you have comments and suggestions please do feel free to send them
>> to
>> the list in advance of the meeting discussion.  After Wednesday we will
>> seek consensus on the list regarding this charter and the future of the
>> working group.
>
> This looks fine, but the devil is in the details of the selected extensions. I have only one minor comment: In Section 3:
>
> OLD:
> "The working group will exist as long as there an extension seeking standards track."
>
> NEW:
> "The working group will exist as long as there is an extension seeking standards track status."
>
> Scott
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email