Re: [eppext] WG Last Call - final charter

["James Galvin" <[e-mail]>]

So far those that have commented have all supported the charter as 
attached.

Gustavo made a suggestion for an additional milestone but that has not 
received much support.  The proposal in this case is to focus on getting 
the charter updated and then we can update the milestones later if that 
is appropriate.  It is also worth mentioned that there is some 
discussion about Gustavo’s document progressing on ICANN’s gtld-tech 
list and I don’t think we should interrupt that just yet.

We did say that today would be the last day for comments.  I didn’t 
indicate a time so we’ll go with close of business everywhere.  Barry 
is already aware of this and I’ll send him an “official” note 
tomorrow morning that the charter is ready to go.

The question of what will happen to the mailing lists has been asked by 
a few people.  When we formally submit the charter and it is approved 
then Barry will make the appropriate requests for the following to 
happen.

1. The regext list will be created.
2. Subscribers of all of “provreg”, “weirds”, and “eppext” 
will be subscribed to regext.
3. The lists “provreg”, “weirds”, and “eppext” will be 
aliased to point to “regext”.

All of this should just happen and we should all just take note when it 
does and then start using the appropriate alias for sending messages to 
the list.

If there are any other questions or concerns please do speak up.

Thanks,

Jim





On 22 Jan 2016, at 16:11, James Galvin wrote:

> Attached is the final charter for the new working group.  It has all 
> changes discussed to date and the milestones as agreed on the list.
>
> There is one change I included that got very little discussion on the 
> list and I wanted to call it out so folks could consider if they want 
> to keep it or remove it.  This is the reason for a “last call” on 
> the charter before committing it to the IESG.
>
>
> Marc Blanchet proposed the text I included in this message:
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/-Ef1Pdi-9uFIZC7yTAYDeIxCZV0
>
> There was no response to this message on the list.
>
>
> Marc first made the suggestion here:
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/ouE4fgfXAUWJG96XvgqjDR9OfoQ
>
> As Chair I had suggested we not include the change but Jacques Latour 
> asked to have the change included.  Here is the final message in this 
> short thread:
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/jCF6tfwIFVGi6E8lXFFKU0TVW3Q
>
>
> Would working group members please indicate their support or objection 
> for this change by Friday, 29 January 2017.  It’s a two sentence 
> change to the charter if folks want to remove it.
>
> Jim