IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [eppext] Working Group Last call for draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase

Gustavo Lozano <gustavo.lozano@icann.org> Fri, 24 July 2015 08:41 UTC

Return-Path: <gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F631A1A2E for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.431
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.431 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AvtK4FLdcfry for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-1.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 789D21A1B30 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-2.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:40:46 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1044.021; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:40:46 -0700
From: Gustavo Lozano <gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
To: Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl>, "eppext@ietf.org" <eppext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [eppext] Working Group Last call for draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase
Thread-Index: AQHQxexuq8REiDuEQ0CM86QZwEQySQ==
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:40:45 +0000
Message-ID: <D1D7C62A.B1D22%gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
References: <B785119F-67E7-4B34-9995-6A6F5806DF10@antoin.nl> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A022CD2@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A022D7F@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <C41D7AF7FCECBE44940E9477E8E70D7A4AE9BCF3@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A0246A7@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <9843E2BC-3B81-4453-9C74-6D698CC1CD37@antoin.nl>
In-Reply-To: <9843E2BC-3B81-4453-9C74-6D698CC1CD37@antoin.nl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.3.150624
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3520579242_1183770"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/GoePuteVM3fWUbrqW2OgRlNZWAA>
Subject: Re: [eppext] Working Group Last call for draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:41:10 -0000

Hi Antoin,

Comments inline.

Regards,
Gustavo

On 7/23/15, 14:10, "EppExt on behalf of Antoin Verschuren"
<eppext-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of ietf@antoin.nl> wrote:

>
>We have 2 options for this:
>-Replace the normative reference to another stable document, perhaps an
>ICANN document?
>-Revive draft-lozano-tmch-func-spec and take it up as a WG document and
>proceed that one first.

draft-lozano-tmch-func-spec has been revived.


>
>Gustavo: Are you willing to revive your document as it is currently
>expired,

Yes 

> and make a request to the WG to adopt it?

I will request the adoption of this ID as a WG document.

>The WG can perhaps already review this document in parallel and provide
>you with feedback.

This will be great.

Regards,
Gustavo

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status