Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama IETF94

[Rik Ribbers <[e-mail]>]

Hello Declan

The conclusion for me is that there was no objection to work on informational document in general by the working group. There was no clear consensus on working on the informational verification draft James Gould was presenting.

As it is Thursday on the IETF (read: I am tired) I may be wrong, so feel free to confirm or correct me.

Gr,
Rik

> On 05 Nov 2015, at 18:42, Declan Ma <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Ulrich,
> 
> It seems that there is an inconsistency  between the minutes and jabber chatting.
> 
> According to the jabber, 
> 
> 
> [e-mail]:
> 	is the WG opposed to taken onboard Informational
> [e-mail]:
> 	hummmmm
> [e-mail]:
> 	yes silence no loud hummmm
> 
> 
> So, Discussion about adoption of informational documents
> 
> “Hum only for no objection” should be corrected to “Hum only for no, objection”.
> 
> 
> Am I making sense here? 
> 
> Shall we review the milestone that contains documents that is still under discussion of adoption?
> 
> 
> 
> Di MA
> 
> ZDNS Ltd.
> 
> http://en.zdns.cn
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> 在 2015年11月5日，17:09，Ulrich Wisser <[e-mail]> 写道：
>> 
>> Please find my minutes below.
>> Feedback is welcome!
>> /Ulrich
>> 
>> 
>> EPPEXT meeting at IETF94 Yokohama 2015-11-05 15:20-17:20
>> 
>> Scott Hollenbeck and Ning Kong as interim chair
>> Both chairs Jim Galvin and Antoin Verschueren in remote participation
>> 
>> draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay
>> draft-eppext-tmch-smd
>>  Both are through last call and AD Barry Leiba is currently reviewing, response expected in the coming weeks.
>> 
>> 
>> draft-ietf-epppext-launchphase
>>  Jim Gould updated the document and thinks it is ready for last call.
>>  shepherd Ulrich Wisser
>> 
>> draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-func-spec-00
>>  shepherd Ulrich Wisser
>> 
>> draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap-02
>> draft-gould-idn-table-02
>> draft-wilcox-cira-idn-eppext-00
>>  James Gould speaks on these drafts. idnmap needs even idntables as to specify possible table name values.
>>  Several of the documents are expired. Renewal is requested or will be directly after the meeting.
>>  Documents will become milestones in the new charter.
>>  wilcox will be retracted or moved to epp-registry.
>> 
>> Jim Galvin presents a list of documents currently in work and will be milestones 
>> for the new charter.
>> 
>> draft-gould-allocation-token
>>  James Goulds speaks on the reasoning behind the extensions.
>>  Opposition to use AuthInfo for this purpose
>> 
>> draft-gould-change-poll
>>  James Gould speaks on the reasoning of the document.
>>  Clients get updates on changes to objects through the poll queue.
>> 
>> draft-gould-epp-rdap-status-mapping
>>  James Gould presents on the reasoning behind the draft.
>>  Comments from the room about the question of standards track or informational
>> 
>> draft-zhou-eppext-reseller-mapping
>> draft-zhou-eppext-reseller-ext
>>  Ning Kong presents
>>  Discussions about need for RDAP extension 
>>  Registrar object suggested with support in the room
>> 
>> draft-gould-eppext-verificationcode
>> draft-xie-eppext-nv-mapping
>>  James Gould presents 
>>  IPR disclosure
>> 
>> Discussion about adoption of informational documents
>>  Hum only for no objection
>> 
>> Discussion about documents to include in working group
>>  - not draft from Alexander Mayerhofer
>>  - Jim proposes to divide docs in groups for the milestones
>>  - opposition and support for nv-mapping document
>>  - Hum, no objections to milestones
>>  - charter presentation and discussions
>>  - Several submissions to not broaden the scope of the group to all things ICANN
>> 
>> -- 
>> Ulrich Wisser
>> [e-mail]
>> _______________________________________________
>> EppExt mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext
> 
> _______________________________________________
> EppExt mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext