[eppext] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay-11: (with COMMENT)

"Alissa Cooper" <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 16 December 2015 20:46 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20151216204656.14006.90329.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:46:56 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/KIPZN7zFKBsxtx-GY8OEcn5C80w>
Cc: eppext-chairs@ietf.org, ulrich@wisser.se, draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay@ietf.org, eppext@ietf.org
Subject: [eppext] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay-11: (with COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Agree with Stephen and looking forward to the IPR declaration being
updated.

In Section 1.2:

"The registry SHOULD have certain policies in place that require the
   losing DNS operator to cooperate with this transaction, however this
   is beyond this document."

This seems like a misplaced normative SHOULD.

[eppext] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ie… Alissa Cooper