Re: [eppext] RDAP adoption?
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Tue, 10 November 2015 17:07 UTC
Return-Path: <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E301B3AFC for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:07:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S9nJlNzQnzmI for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:07:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x262.google.com (mail-qg0-x262.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::262]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAC201A1A52 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:07:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qgea14 with SMTP id a14so198489qge.2 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:07:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=verisign_com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=pcvW/tFo8vClYdhwvkgLIv4uK8WIZdYKnfJto42FFU0=; b=nCL2WO6H7IbrJfsW0h5z6z7SPv98C+OmPXptP2i+o8YD++PPVqWL5mR2LUN+Ns7eiG WHZW1u9z1lfCJrYNeXuJv6OjQmlXExppLQBPT10gyZ1rUrpbSLn67Q5uuc2xJ2Ci1d1o v3vFmcCyIiiPZ8qfhXuiMfdVp3BqQqYL3kWIv/WqjZJMJHcfYmkPDSurFnOq9SSyyjgH ion0MiQ+L+wGex5NwPf/7v6qAVekS/I6rD1XkBpqOB9u9hewvPLlyvGo1OVdROfB5bfe z1XRcnthjB3GHG6q56dnM/yXcHq2w2v7M2qfqC0TpIZKs+No5fIyLgLWxxqZQkVx2by/ qp3g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language :content-language:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; bh=pcvW/tFo8vClYdhwvkgLIv4uK8WIZdYKnfJto42FFU0=; b=l0Bm+LhDZyjuBP02HnBWQuNFbmG0Z5qUu6Oj58gYHVst/Hzlg0aJ80PDMZhSYw1EFc YHGje90pw3OACeo53CuisBEYeNdLied82TQtY5ccFixkZOuZky6HE4oE6tX/v/++BvwA 3IqOzz/+zLeGFyjF2r2Y/2LNpYAaUUWrwDenzPwPUYYxih83tVS8GTA/NC1ZOp2og+zZ F/vPs9Wrd+2zqt8QTBdXgV88h52qkcuv5ErjxCDK3ffQiK6884J2PL9peReOF9otFM/A YY4UbmDnfpHKzN0cd5lYuVil8f6EUWLpfFopB4f68uQg6u4xKq9fl+Xv9TPMN8pM7+vQ uNCw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl+H74Z8Q8NhuOAjImzrY7ITYebJNGFV9jB29P/zuKnnipySbwo+B2XD2J3wJBmSycr/iLI0vqMwk5Wt2mAu2pR0hPw1A==
X-Received: by 10.55.207.139 with SMTP id v11mr5629804qkl.53.1447175255585; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:07:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com (brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com. [72.13.63.42]) by smtp-relay.gmail.com with ESMTPS id p23sm386786qkl.0.2015.11.10.09.07.35 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:07:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Relaying-Domain: verisign.com
Received: from brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas01 [10.173.152.205]) by brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tAAH7YUt017957 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:07:35 -0500
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:07:34 -0500
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: "dcrocker@bbiw.net" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
Thread-Topic: [eppext] RDAP adoption?
Thread-Index: AQHRG72IKaddwQWbvU6SpkqRtyvmnZ6VnqYAgAAVF4D//8jrYA==
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:07:34 +0000
Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A0DF4F1@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
References: <564167D3.7050805@dcrocker.net> <CAAQiQReK_hUOhX-TyCibTphr5M81P7fT8_8o6XQgrAHuHGV04Q@mail.gmail.com> <56420BDB.6050802@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <56420BDB.6050802@dcrocker.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/Nwybv0IfMXQbYN5p8hirUWuEpKc>
Cc: "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>, eppext <eppext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eppext] RDAP adoption?
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:07:38 -0000
> -----Original Message----- > From: EppExt [mailto:eppext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dave Crocker > Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 10:23 AM > To: Andrew Newton > Cc: weirds@ietf.org; eppext > Subject: Re: [eppext] RDAP adoption? [snip] > We have quite a bit of unfortunate history with good efforts at > producing specs that lacked sustained community effort at adoption. > This one sounds much better than those unfortunate cases, but as DNSSec > demonstrated it is too easy to lose momentum. You might want to have > an > explicit -- if informal -- community effort organized at adoption and > use. RDAP has been the focus of a recent series of operationally-focused workshops that I've helped organize. There will be more in the future. Scott
- Re: [eppext] RDAP adoption? Mario Loffredo
- Re: [eppext] RDAP adoption? Rubens Kuhl
- [eppext] RDAP adoption? Dave Crocker
- Re: [eppext] RDAP adoption? Andrew Newton
- Re: [eppext] RDAP adoption? Rik Ribbers
- Re: [eppext] RDAP adoption? Rubens Kuhl
- Re: [eppext] RDAP adoption? Dave Crocker
- Re: [eppext] RDAP adoption? Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [eppext] RDAP adoption? Mario Loffredo
- Re: [eppext] RDAP adoption? Andrew Newton