Re: [eppext] WG Meeting at IETF-95?

"Gould, James" <JGould@verisign.com> Fri, 05 February 2016 18:52 UTC

Return-Path: <JGould@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679571A8032 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:52:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OSY9HRNjTugZ for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:52:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x263.google.com (mail-oi0-x263.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::263]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAB8D1A87AD for <eppext@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:52:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x263.google.com with SMTP id w5so3808552oie.3 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 10:52:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=verisign-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language :content-type:mime-version; bh=zP1jl0+DiGURzDvxPFZTY3TeSB8CruDwCf1Zu4ym3Xc=; b=EwW2j05+/pxDpcVHO9SmnlH4Cy3lIC2heyl/iMHLM6WFll1jED8QcmIuirTud/VXvy nyIMMPjtEII/Y6MP6foVnUhQlATvDzwwdGlBvquvDJ8HiUjgXMis6Z2zgiZRm32nUXpq OeczjS3bgrdDdqTrjXAazPNl5yEf4MXFYxEj6mdB9Fdfn2HtDbuzPGiitVGds/yeXRt2 Xk/WdshGaEEKrIH4stfgh9+t1DP4XsLnF9WzEsJZzhvL/Ta7UAbka6gbBGr9IPC6CBvL nkcWglPQqotlsOnnBYignvOJW+BDVWjXNl/mRYZN+xMFnESSkvk38Eaf86YmLJehlN49 i/ww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language :content-language:content-type:mime-version; bh=zP1jl0+DiGURzDvxPFZTY3TeSB8CruDwCf1Zu4ym3Xc=; b=hjg5SmrMvE8ihKpjln8oBgrLd+T1eu0+XRP4SwafRSLmmE43ndt+m4rqojhPpqpZPw pgcoBfhOVX8rQSmFw8q/1ci63glI5yTAkX5FBzkIGCyPacrerwVIfhoNGOcSwJOnOmIf ixrMwjghf0B0RsSA3vnhTd+/V+lU2XJw8A5zPE9Fglt5iqe6IeOn6u3whjtDvcagScOQ Y/aFZIRfujhua592JCo2VV8e8lbYlDTPbLl5HmZXYlegUyXuIZteOAeSNtLMrIEYHrIo d8xpMG6DQ8b7/2gC9rZ1VcL8/Nt0tyChCxuEM2E1ujislH+tBxop+y5CUFRBIGvy2bcW sDLQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTNkxfZf72cDKZ9G3qBVDTwNk+H8o79f1gS4RLhtBfsEWcT9kXS/YJFYdyZ5HgC1YmpKZ0XJ3edMx/neuSPe0pPt/ll
X-Received: by 10.140.152.78 with SMTP id 75mr6880201qhy.22.1454698365960; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 10:52:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com (brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com. [72.13.63.41]) by smtp-relay.gmail.com with ESMTPS id d123sm2481292qka.12.2016.02.05.10.52.45 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Feb 2016 10:52:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Relaying-Domain: verisign.com
Received: from brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas01 [10.173.152.205]) by brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u15IqiAA031805 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 5 Feb 2016 13:52:45 -0500
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 13:52:44 -0500
From: "Gould, James" <JGould@verisign.com>
To: Linlin Zhou <zhoulinlin@cnnic.cn>
Thread-Topic: [eppext] WG Meeting at IETF-95?
Thread-Index: AdFdtfnPyF1fw9YKR+WH8rMqAVdV6gAR9p4AAHx+QP4AICAngA==
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 18:52:43 +0000
Message-ID: <494933F5-886E-45A9-9B18-2FF97A9BBE4B@verisign.com>
References: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A14F898@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <96A760E5-FCF9-4067-9BB7-D1EBB12D3AD5@antoin.nl> <2016020315230055273418@cnnic.cn>
In-Reply-To: <2016020315230055273418@cnnic.cn>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_004_494933F5886E45A99B182FF97A9BBE4Bverisigncom_"; type="multipart/alternative"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/ObuZrNDLQhwuYgFobpy-jSBpXfE>
Cc: Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl>, "eppext@ietf.org" <eppext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eppext] WG Meeting at IETF-95?
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 18:52:49 -0000

I would like to propose 15 minutes on the agenda to discuss the mailing list thread http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/eppext/current/msg00918.html, that is associated with the approach for the check command and response in draft-brown-epp-fees-06.

—


JG


[cid:77031CC3-BE7A-4188-A95F-D23115A30A4D@vcorp.ad.vrsn.com]

James Gould
Distinguished Engineer
jgould@Verisign.com

703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

VerisignInc.com<http://VerisignInc.com>

On Feb 5, 2016, at 3:32 AM, Linlin Zhou <zhoulinlin@cnnic.cn<mailto:zhoulinlin@cnnic.cn>> wrote:

Dear chairs,
I'd like to ask for a 10-15 minutes time slot to give a quick update on reseller drafts if it is possible. The 03-version will be updated before IETF meeting. Thanks.

Regards,
________________________________
Linlin Zhou

From: Antoin Verschuren<mailto:ietf@antoin.nl>
Date: 2016-02-03 00:08
To: eppext@ietf.org<mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eppext] WG Meeting at IETF-95?
Hi Scott, all.

Now that our charter is progressing, we intend to ask for a meeting slot in Buenos Aires.
Jim and I are teaming up next friday to discuss a possible agenda and request a meeting slot.
In the mean time, if people want to propose agenda items already, please let the chairs know.
We intend to request a 2 hour slot, and will solicit for speakers after next friday if none have volunteered.

- --
Antoin Verschuren

Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392






Op 2 feb. 2016, om 13:33 heeft Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck@verisign.com<mailto:shollenbeck@verisign.com>> het volgende geschreven:

> The cut-off for submitting WG meeting requests for IETF-95 is 19 February. The question has been asked more than once with no response - have our chairs submitted a meeting request? Do they intend to?
>
> Scott
>
> _______________________________________________
> EppExt mailing list
> EppExt@ietf.org<mailto:EppExt@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext



_______________________________________________
EppExt mailing list
EppExt@ietf.org<mailto:EppExt@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext
_______________________________________________
EppExt mailing list
EppExt@ietf.org<mailto:EppExt@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext