Re: [eppext] Recharter Milestones discussion

[Rik Ribbers <[e-mail]>]

All, 

General feedback: I don’t have a very strong opinion about priorities and order. If a document is ready for submission let’s just submit it and move on. 

> Group 1
> 
> -epp-rdap mapping (draft-gould-epp-rdap-status-mapping)
> -verification code (draft-gould-eppext-verificationcode)
> -nv mapping (draft-xie-eppext-nv-mapping)(Remains as Informational, but reviewed by WG)
> 

I  have a question about the verification drafts. During the Yokohama meeting someone (James Gould?) stated that the verification drafts should have the highest priority over others and somehow they ended up in group 1. What I missed is the reasoning why. There are other drafts that are longer part of this working group and deserve higher priority in my opinion (like resellers and change poll en the fees drafts). Can somebody explain the reasoning why these are (so) important.

> -Relay (no draft yet, split from keyrelay)


There is no document so there is no need to add it to the milestones. The charter is explicit enough to add any document if the WG thinks it is of value. Personally I don’t see this document happening very soon.

Furthermore
Will there be an individual call-for-adoption per document or if the document is on the charter it is adopted? 
In the last case. How are we going to make sure the documents get enough review before submission?
In the first case. Can we explicitly ask for reviewers and people willing to work on the document during the adoption?

Gr,
Rik