Re: [eppext] Meeting at IETF-92

James Galvin <galvin@elistx.com> Mon, 23 February 2015 21:16 UTC

Return-Path: <galvin@elistx.com>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF1B1A6F27 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:16:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xpv3aCsHfe5c for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:16:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qc0-f179.google.com (mail-qc0-f179.google.com [209.85.216.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 162591A6F17 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:16:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qcrw7 with SMTP id w7so13289048qcr.4 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:16:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=v1jLh29ZUYBCQLuZPD4EJSBxRc8IYsn8/6P+qayAAnY=; b=dKQ6egcJIrhzpkrhk/8Nh7D/M7oeW6iFw5TqeDqA/EVxdB+wMb8hp8BVsZbG5O/i5M xngkkueDNtDvEJ6f9lAcf7fCl5TWExTL8C1ZxrcWzhCsrRuNkX28Uq3zHEFs16EUY3ru dvIdtkpFuSHVxCHamBhvGeIheoenQyhEc2jOm7bF27zPlCxHp8ZLMI/SBasj+HB3jz0X 3Cg26HInGrvLi/WrY1l/8qSNPDTLSMQrW5LktPN2gQ11IT9qTNrDQsL3fa//sEgBmwPh EozjJaBBahpHpnnE2kt1QHlb6Pc6IGRiZ3XdBDLjZISQgKS6riG2W6/s81RzOeIYtDLq WoFA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkFYk4I0mtlGyaORM+NQEJrVhac0Rq9oLTg2/Q1ZzZ1z5jdoXtMngBATSabph5QdBsXgetx
X-Received: by 10.229.71.69 with SMTP id g5mr29340539qcj.7.1424726204331; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:16:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jgalvin-lt.local (c-73-133-108-218.hsd1.md.comcast.net. [73.133.108.218]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 142sm18198980qhg.16.2015.02.23.13.16.43 for <eppext@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:16:43 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54EB98D1.40607@elistx.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 16:17:05 -0500
From: James Galvin <galvin@elistx.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "eppext@ietf.org" <eppext@ietf.org>
References: <07D5589F-2BD2-41DD-BCDD-647D86D1FA0A@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <07D5589F-2BD2-41DD-BCDD-647D86D1FA0A@verisign.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/RKECinXkJ5Gp1bMD56anGfhwwe8>
Subject: Re: [eppext] Meeting at IETF-92
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 21:16:47 -0000

Actually, help from the working group would be great!

The issue is the opportunity to request a meeting snuck up on the 
chairs, so we urgently grasped at the opportunity and our AD obliged, 
although we drew the short straw this time and got the last meeting slot 
on Friday.

That said, following up on our discussions from the last IETF, I would 
expect our agenda to at least look like the following.

1. Complete (or plan) working group last call on all existing EPP 
extension documents.

2. Consider the question of rechartering to continue review of standards 
track EPP extension proposal.

Comments and suggestions from the working group are welcome.

I will send some messages to move existing documents and discussions 
along shortly.

Jim
co-Chair



On 2/22/15 6:19 PM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> The preliminary agenda has been posted. Right now eppext has a Friday afternoon slot. Please plan accordingly, folks.
>
> It would be nice if our chairs shared their thoughts on the agenda...
>
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> EppExt mailing list
> EppExt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext
>