Re: [eppext] Thank You for Your Review and Feedback
Patrick Mevzek <pm@dotandco.com> Tue, 07 April 2015 14:11 UTC
Return-Path: <patrick@shaktot.patoche.org>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722BC1A6FF2
for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 07:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.013
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.013 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id RMY7hfggCXdy for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 7 Apr 2015 07:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaktot.patoche.org (shaktot.patoche.org [212.85.152.86])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0F001A885D
for <eppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 07:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaktot.patoche.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by shaktot.patoche.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id t37E9PHJ018622
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Tue, 7 Apr 2015 16:09:25 +0200
Received: (from patrick@localhost)
by shaktot.patoche.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id t37E9OaT018621;
Tue, 7 Apr 2015 16:09:24 +0200
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 16:09:24 +0200
From: Patrick Mevzek <pm@dotandco.com>
To: "Gould, James" <JGould@verisign.com>
Message-ID: <20150407140924.GA32722@home.patoche.org>
References: <D4FDC322-6320-4407-95E4-19DA37E10B46@verisign.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <D4FDC322-6320-4407-95E4-19DA37E10B46@verisign.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Scanned-By: shaktot_dot_patoche_dot_org on 212.85.152.86
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/SU8tKR93Kr4iULa4NkiwL_hjjxE>
Cc: "eppext@ietf.org" <eppext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eppext] Thank You for Your Review and Feedback
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>,
<mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>,
<mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 14:24:35 -0000
Gould, James <JGould@verisign.com> 2015-04-06 23:39 > I want to formally thank the Designated Experts (DE) for reviewing and providing back thoughtful feedback for the Verisign EPP extension registry submissions. I have many notes taken from the feedback to look into. For your information and if it may be useful to the WG, my opensource EPP client Net::DRI implements all the 18 announced Verisign EPP extensions except for now: Defensive Registration Namewatch Personal Registration Registry Mapping Related Domain JobsContact (I have one using another namespace, so will need to check what has changed) I'm planning to add them soon to Net::DRI, and also other extensions that were talked about recently here. All interested parties for interoperability tests or other exchange of informations, users and authors of extensions are welcome to contact me in private, as well as contributors. I'm also very much interested to sense usage among users to know which extensions would be better to have before others. Regards, -- Patrick Mevzek
- [eppext] Thank You for Your Review and Feedback Gould, James
- Re: [eppext] Thank You for Your Review and Feedba… Patrick Mevzek