[eppext] Fwd: rechartering
Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> Tue, 28 July 2015 13:19 UTC
Return-Path: <andy@hxr.us>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A875F1A8AB3 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HNTc8gUvdtlg for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6253A1A8F36 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so160437519wib.1 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=UsBhyQj8hamJauYaGwp07OzAGV+CpdOsdjNw8VipMZ8=; b=SsvCb5SgQF1moKA55oAOTJk49Oe5T7hAS9AQEjGXIX/mmZ9gYxc7kh6H0L1SiyRnWW GeqcCoeD5cmgtOiYvOsNSrTHoStUlFH/Oj7NNSX+/gTd+vzK3gQd/KseFfP9T8iyxPL8 u7Bz6uh+cxkL62fzVo+7no3EKI66lKIr++4boc3JoFDG+54JIvTiEAU4kUuMKr85+nQ6 kWqOr5eR3NrM+FYt8O48IWzMXgWf65u2Sr/yJgYeqCZuf2vyswO/RiMRT8/tPLAL9cU6 256ydGVGaos92ESA3kEV7ir5HYkerzax/Xiw9V4XxDRfh9+mDJjWMIlXUJ5KTxKwd5GE cWAg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkHr+azv1+XPRq+RUOQMi8Mi4PvyuqqaZOmezsnsxV2wdA++yGUU9o4g1ngg6NeS3JH9D0E
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.104.8 with SMTP id ga8mr35024480wib.5.1438089595139; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.249.99 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:500:4:15:2081:b835:d5d5:308]
In-Reply-To: <CAAQiQRdBDKb8NF+d2COxTVCbx7MMtV4dsTRDSqBotq6XroHxBQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAQiQRdBDKb8NF+d2COxTVCbx7MMtV4dsTRDSqBotq6XroHxBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:19:54 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAQiQRd=65H=oTGFEz5ew_+cbKiKZo+xu5Ypb+cf89KtrPK0Pw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
To: "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>, eppext@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d04427130794cb1051bef53d9"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/T5bL1EnASv0xGfHdlDWeDFSrB5c>
Subject: [eppext] Fwd: rechartering
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:19:59 -0000
Since there has been no negative feedback, I'm cross-posting this to WEIRDS to see what people over there think. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> Date: Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:21 PM Subject: rechartering To: eppext@ietf.org All, I'd like to offer another idea for the rechartering of this working group. Instead of focusing exclusively on EPP extensions, would it be better if we rechartered to focus on protocol issues of Internet registries... more specifically EPP and RDAP. Given that the constituencies for both have considerable overlap, and there is already at least one draft covering the mapping between EPP and RDAP and that there will likely be future drafts where the inputs of EPP and the outputs of RDAP are correlated, this seems like an easier way forward. I spoke privately with Scott, Barry, and Pete (the AD behind the chartering of both EPPEXT and WEIRDS) just to see if I wasn't barking madd, and they each thought it makes sense. What are your thoughts and comments about such an approach? -andy
- [eppext] rechartering Andrew Newton
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Marc Blanchet
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Hollenbeck, Scott
- [eppext] Fwd: rechartering Andrew Newton
- Re: [eppext] [weirds] Fwd: rechartering Ulrich Wisser
- Re: [eppext] [weirds] Fwd: rechartering Roger D Carney
- Re: [eppext] [weirds] Fwd: rechartering Andrew Newton
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Patrick Mevzek
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Rik Ribbers
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Andrew Newton
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Andrew Newton
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Rik Ribbers
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Frederico A C Neves
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Marc Blanchet
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Andrew Newton
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Marc Blanchet
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Patrick Mevzek