Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama IETF94

"Linlin Zhou" <zhoulinlin@cnnic.cn> Thu, 05 November 2015 15:19 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoulinlin@cnnic.cn>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F2A1B2F0E for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 07:19:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.012
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_64=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vBk2XeJrKQTf for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 07:19:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp13.cnnic.cn [218.241.118.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E281B2F0D for <eppext@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 07:19:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ajax-webmail-ocmail02.zx.nicx.cn (Coremail) ; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 23:19:03 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
X-CM-HeaderCharset: UTF-8
X-Originating-IP: [218.241.102.150]
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 23:19:03 +0800
From: Linlin Zhou <zhoulinlin@cnnic.cn>
To: Rik Ribbers <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl>
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Coremail Webmail Server Version XT3.0.5b dev build 20150108(58896.7041) Copyright (c) 2002-2015 www.mailtech.cn cnnic
In-Reply-To: <CDF93078-FA84-48EB-8EC0-DAE733681C6E@sidn.nl>
References: <CAJ9-zoXEL_QMsGJ1ZkNr61VHqXRCFCR8o6_UHO7vZxRtV-ZL=w@mail.gmail.com> <0101FBC0-248F-4560-9364-F023B901A959@zdns.cn> <38638B99-20DF-40B3-B431-36ECFE27485F@sidn.nl> <2015110519525639913345@teleinfo.cn> <CDF93078-FA84-48EB-8EC0-DAE733681C6E@sidn.nl>
X-SendMailWithSms: false
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <77db8b89.aea.150d83acd38.Coremail.zhoulinlin@cnnic.cn>
X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf0DJ0DhncztWE990Bg--.1752W
X-CM-SenderInfo: p2kr3zplqox0w6fq0xffof0/1tbiAQAEBiVCNzp+VgAAsB
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Ur529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7IcSsGvfJ3iIAIbVAYjsxI4VW5Jw CS07vEb4IE77IF4wCS07vE1I0E4x80FVAKz4kxMIAIbVAFxVCaYxvI4VCIwcAKzIAtYxBI daVFxhVjvjDU=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/TH8F7C-4le0Z3-EGqwzsi4vym8o>
Cc: Ulrich Wisser <ulrich@wisser.se>, "xiejiagui@teleinfo.cn" <xiejiagui@teleinfo.cn>, eppext <EppExt@ietf.org>, Declan Ma <madi@zdns.cn>
Subject: Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama IETF94
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 15:19:25 -0000

Dear WG,

> I see your point. I am a horrible jabber scribe….I missed that remark by Jim Galvin completely. 
> 
> 
> @Chairs: Can you make a clear statement on the list to either confirm or decline my interpretation about the verification drafts being adopted or not. 
> 
Same question to chairs. Could you please confirm on the mailing list again whether nv draft is included in WG document?
I recalled my memory that several people have comments to express concerns on nv draft and it seems not be fully supported to be adopted. But it appeared in the milestone. It confused me a lot. Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > On 05 Nov 2015, at 20:52, xiejiagui@teleinfo.cnwrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Hello Rik,
> > Let me post the messages from the Jabber:
> > <Catch.jpg>
> > <CatchF973.jpg>
> > 
> > 
> > Jim Galvin(JimG?) has confirmed  this . 
> > 
> > 
> > We do think it's useful to discuss this draft in the WG, and any comments about this draft are welcome.
> > 
Regards,
Linlin