Re: [eppext] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd-04: (with COMMENT)

Gustavo Lozano <gustavo.lozano@icann.org> Thu, 18 February 2016 18:47 UTC

Return-Path: <gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15C21A6EFB; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:47:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.207
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.207 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ujVi-k9m8tuf; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:47:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-2.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDEF51AC3BA; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:47:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:47:15 -0800
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1130.005; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:47:15 -0800
From: Gustavo Lozano <gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Thread-Topic: Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd-04: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHRanzILsOmjsRByUaABOzFtLSTNQ==
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:47:14 +0000
Message-ID: <D2EB50C5.F50FF%gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
References: <20160209181512.5582.37235.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160209181512.5582.37235.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.0.151221
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.35.2]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="B_3538637225_848819"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/UK2Kx85CKAsQl3EFhiDHig94yDU>
Cc: "draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd@ietf.org>, "eppext-chairs@ietf.org" <eppext-chairs@ietf.org>, "eppext@ietf.org" <eppext@ietf.org>, "nkong@cnnic.cn" <nkong@cnnic.cn>
Subject: Re: [eppext] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:47:20 -0000

Thank you for your review Spencer,

I think that your comment make sense.

@Barry, at this point of the evaluation process: is it a good idea to
upload a new version of the draft with minor updates?, or, should I work
with the RFC editor to make minor changes?



Regards,
Gustavo

On 2/9/16, 10:15, "Spencer Dawkins" <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote:

>Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
>draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd-04: No Objection
>
>When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
>The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd/
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>COMMENT:
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>The phrase "Sunrise Period" may be a well-known term of art, but the
>meaning isn't obvious in the Abstract. It's explained well with one
>sentence in the Introduction - perhaps that sentence could be included in
>the abstract as well?
>
>