Re: [eppext] EPP Extension Registration Requests from DK-Hostmaster

Roger D Carney <> Mon, 21 September 2015 21:14 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E6B1A908B for <>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 14:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ShMi9_6_jHGj for <>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 14:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:742]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D67D1A907F for <>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 14:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 21:14:06 +0000
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.01.0274.009; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 21:14:06 +0000
From: Roger D Carney <>
To: "" <>
Thread-Topic: EPP Extension Registration Requests from DK-Hostmaster
Thread-Index: AdDq7urJYTp6HZLPTQ+N25QbSe00ZQJlYXPw
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 21:14:05 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is );
x-originating-ip: []
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR0201MB0775; 5:GjDP3JiY8h32C56kruy2+7Fn2YJelMc2sNpuEOlq86zJ3o5SK3ZYqEmN+q1vc+WYgnteTwaXssre8ib+UlGbHDG38fjg6sEHEnKsl7ieKR8X/MKd6a6vl+p4AvqzhlcXmxCsbfyiS94FQKVvfSsJMw==; 24:Vg8QJRb1CDMefA/0K52kfdtTiHyum5ZeDxjLF+peXZgaW0XaFlBF+7vu4ynn4kWZxvzRGdEFG5HJOKhGYCV4o9YtvzvsN2SrRuBvEY5lVHE=; 20:Ef7nMEsSrjRTD39hm5v8PELvHf9OnVipIM2N+n0k8Lu9Jf2HUsvYcF1Pu6nbxFljJpERePQKrES4hdCkZVoFvg==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR0201MB0775;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR0201MB0775; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR0201MB0775;
x-forefront-prvs: 07063A0A30
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(199003)(189002)(13464003)(19580405001)(19580395003)(5001860100001)(2351001)(5003600100002)(81156007)(105586002)(101416001)(64706001)(4001540100001)(5001830100001)(77156002)(106356001)(62966003)(46102003)(66066001)(450100001)(76176999)(102836002)(15975445007)(2950100001)(50986999)(2900100001)(87936001)(5002640100001)(77096005)(74316001)(76576001)(10400500002)(99286002)(33656002)(68736005)(107886002)(110136002)(189998001)(97736004)(40100003)(5004730100002)(92566002)(86362001)(122556002)(54356999)(11100500001)(2501003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR0201MB0775;; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None ( does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Sep 2015 21:14:06.0772 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: d5f1622b-14a3-45a6-b069-003f8dc4851f
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR0201MB0775
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [eppext] EPP Extension Registration Requests from DK-Hostmaster
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 21:14:36 -0000

Good Afternoon,

I have completed my review of these extensions as DE and I have no significant comments. 

Minor comments:  
Generally speaking it would seem to be more readable if "like" examples used the same example data (e.g. create request uses as the domain name but the create response uses

It appears that many of the examples have not been updated to the latest version of the dkhm XSD (several references to 1.2 and 1.3)


-----Original Message-----
From: EppExt [] On Behalf Of Hollenbeck, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 6:02 AM
Subject: [eppext] EPP Extension Registration Requests from DK-Hostmaster

Yesterday I received 10 requests from IANA to review EPP extensions submitted by DK-Hostmaster. I'll forward each of them to this list momentarily. I've reviewed all of them and I'm going to suggest that they be considered as one request since each describes an element that is part of the same schema and the same specification.


EppExt mailing list