IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [eppext] Draft minutes from 22 July 2015 Working Group meeting

James Galvin <galvin@elistx.com> Thu, 23 July 2015 12:24 UTC

Return-Path: <galvin@elistx.com>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F1871A92E4 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 05:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xVLQr_EYec7R for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 05:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47A221A0191 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 05:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so216397765wib.0 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 05:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZhYV78vEJe/crdsY8sSW5tsCnAEyfhmLPMBEElpUFi4=; b=Z/dr0csmdxf6eZXu8P9kFXxjbCpEv/YIMyuYskUPUf8c+4HpYdpu0s1ysGK+qGIBxW 7KBxdYouUYL9qN51x+CdipxKmqgHPB+jZsJEruNYk4hGlKRbmhH1P3eOrwdj3SGRjuV7 31j0ODF8K4At4sJ/4NUh2HiGc3VwQRRtsB/h7yVWQg9FP13xnKi/1BgjKL6TKH7uhYZn XR1fYnDqK5+ekXn86Aj81jEgBIdj2NFA31j9tmmmhmY+hrZ4spqUsoYOpWgVnssK8EQ3 fjXzJzLF19sNnrJkrnivH3ZYtIN9kExSteAnUgOHKwivq6rlNmwkzV894rBOpexZLm4i m5qA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQntHHgEUS/zdyc/pQKdCkdKl2CVnh9H9YLk0EmpA832QZpjBvhtuNB3tgOxKxA3StAR+gTo
X-Received: by 10.194.89.98 with SMTP id bn2mr16814337wjb.153.1437654269085; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 05:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-b0cf.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-b0cf.meeting.ietf.org. [31.133.176.207]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id ma15sm26923223wic.20.2015.07.23.05.24.26 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Jul 2015 05:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
To: Roger D Carney <rcarney@godaddy.com>, eppext <eppext@ietf.org>
References: <55B0C9A1.4000000@elistx.com> <BN1PR02MB119B8825A075A7B53F0EDC9B1820@BN1PR02MB119.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
From: James Galvin <galvin@elistx.com>
Message-ID: <55B0DD0B.10004@elistx.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:24:43 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BN1PR02MB119B8825A075A7B53F0EDC9B1820@BN1PR02MB119.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/c4-5tnBiGGcn5hj-I5qxl9fp2aQ>
Subject: Re: [eppext] Draft minutes from 22 July 2015 Working Group meeting
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 12:24:32 -0000

Thanks Roger I'll update the notes.

Jim



On 7/23/15 2:08 PM, Roger D Carney wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Just wanted to clarify that I will be posting a Validate Extension to the list soon, this is not related to the proposed Fees Extension, I just brought I up at the same time I was advocating for the fees extension to enter the WG.
>
> This proposed extension is to validate transform commands (without actual execution), our focus was contacts as there are a lot of "unknown" policies for valid contacts when associated to a domain and we would like to have the registries confirm the contacts prior to our domain create commands failing, with the goal of making our customer experience more friendly and instructive.
>
>
> Thanks
> Roger
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: EppExt [mailto:eppext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Galvin
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 6:02 AM
> To: eppext
> Subject: [eppext] Draft minutes from 22 July 2015 Working Group meeting
>
> Included here are the draft minutes from our meeting on Wednesday, 22 July 2015.
>
> Thanks to Alexander Mayrhofer for taking the notes and making them available so quickly.
>
> If you were present, please review these for accuracy and completeness.
>
> If there are any questions please post them to the list.
>
> All comments, corrections, and questions are due no later than 31 July 2015.
>
> Jim and Antoin
> _______________________________________________
> EppExt mailing list
> EppExt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email