Re: [eppext] Recharter Milestones discussion

Roger D Carney <> Fri, 04 December 2015 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 641D91A895C for <>; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 09:40:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nvpp2zri_yf0 for <>; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 09:40:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::755]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 858741A8AC2 for <>; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 09:40:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.325.17; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 17:40:02 +0000
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.01.0331.023; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 17:40:02 +0000
From: Roger D Carney <>
To: eppext <>
Thread-Topic: [eppext] Recharter Milestones discussion
Thread-Index: AQHRLoRJA3fJ+cupPkqatnSJSLn09J66v/uAgAAf6QCAACf+AIAADtgg
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 17:40:01 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is );
x-originating-ip: []
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR0201MB0776; 5:pbpW4Zg3AsoTv4fa3grzcyPqGvoZsSQgEuUIJJlLfKipWEHGxzMhmTgeoq+p4r9knq+n14QMdctioAr7Vltyx7FoEUiZdwd6TJ0kx4ws2rp06MKpeHu+3fhBc28JQjhii4EYRbmz0ERBE4tl3rgJxA==; 24:CASj6YL5qRScRzCvUF74g7BTC7O1tI2GSHs0fLDXK5SeqXgTmQkyQRV5fXTuJ15i8rjjeBEsAmRBLd4PGdAm5zHkG5AU/Kmo6otPBvHGcqw=; 20:o+1S/5gG7fsg3wvONUeXSjwQbVfq0FeGgiwuaiuDyj9/vyDvkyIuYkRqgHrofU8y9f4PyxeXsocOFc+AstThGg==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR0201MB0776;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(520078)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046); SRVR:BY2PR0201MB0776; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR0201MB0776;
x-forefront-prvs: 07807C55DC
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(979002)(6009001)(24454002)(13464003)(377454003)(51444003)(199003)(189002)(1220700001)(11100500001)(6116002)(102836003)(1096002)(3846002)(92566002)(15975445007)(2950100001)(2900100001)(77096005)(122556002)(10400500002)(93886004)(76576001)(101416001)(33656002)(189998001)(54356999)(76176999)(50986999)(5008740100001)(5004730100002)(19580405001)(19580395003)(586003)(87936001)(66066001)(86362001)(107886002)(5001960100002)(110136002)(97736004)(74316001)(81156007)(40100003)(5002640100001)(5003600100002)(450100001)(106356001)(99286002)(106116001)(105586002)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR0201MB0776;; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None ( does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Dec 2015 17:40:01.6460 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: d5f1622b-14a3-45a6-b069-003f8dc4851f
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR0201MB0776
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [eppext] Recharter Milestones discussion
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 17:40:30 -0000

Good Morning, 

I agree with Andy.  Let's remove Relay as a milestone and get the charter approved with the list of milestones that we have and we will adapt as we move forward.


-----Original Message-----
From: EppExt [] On Behalf Of Andrew Newton
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 10:40 AM
To: Antoin Verschuren
Cc: eppext
Subject: Re: [eppext] Recharter Milestones discussion

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Antoin Verschuren <> wrote:
> That does not mean we cannot work on documents in group 3 before the deadline.
> If we’re done earlier with documents in group 3 because there happens to be momentum for one of the drafts that’s fine too.

I think that is the important thing. No working group has ever been penalized for completing work ahead of schedule (probably because no working group has ever completed work ahead of schedule, but that's a different matter).

As long as we recognize that milestones are malleable and that the IESG wants an initial starting point, I'm good with what you have stated.


EppExt mailing list